Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : new driver 185.85 WHQL
Author | Message |
---|---|
There is new driver. | |
ID: 9443 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
it seem to work fine on my sys. with gtx 260. | |
ID: 9445 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I test, and I have again the same errors, like 185.66, 185.68. 08/05/2009 19:27:31 GPUGRID Starting task 21-KASHIF_HIVPR_dim_ba2-4-100-RND7086_0 using acemd version 664 <core_client_version>6.6.20</core_client_version> I use boinc 6.6.20 on vista 64, and I have 1 GTX260 and one 8800GT. It works good with ancient driver official 182.50. | |
ID: 9485 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Rivatuner cannot detect the 185.85 driver for some people--others it does..go figure. I've lost RT in the 1 rig running 185.85. I've DLed Nvidia System Tools....looks simple enough....can't get the damn thing to work though....:( | |
ID: 9487 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I have been using Precision for a while, pretty easy although if you set the fan on auto *sometimes* it forgets and temps start to rise. I have not narrowed it down to exactly when, and there certainly is the possibility that it was me that screwed up and not the tool :am: | |
ID: 9494 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Works good on Win. XP64 with Boinc 6.6.20 with gtx260 and gt9800. | |
ID: 9496 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I have been using Precision for a while, pretty easy although if you set the fan on auto *sometimes* it forgets and temps start to rise. I have not narrowed it down to exactly when, and there certainly is the possibility that it was me that screwed up and not the tool :am: I'm WCed, but it's always good to know when something doesn't work 100% the way it should.....;) One thing that I like about Precision tool is that it will OC all Gpus on startup--that doesn't work with RT.... Works good on Win. XP64 with Boinc 6.6.20 with gtx260 and gt9800. Vista 64 here...6.6.28, 2x 8800GS | |
ID: 9502 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I've just finished my first WU on Windows XP Home with 185.85 WHQL and Boinc 6.6.28 with a GTS250 here (and the most recent beta 185.81 here) and my timestep has dramatically reduced to 47.36ms (42.65ms for the latest beta 185.81), which is the lowest I have ever had. | |
ID: 9513 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
185.85, Vista 64, BOINC 6.6.28, GTX295 | |
ID: 9516 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
The problems with the units only involve the cards not being a 2XX. | |
ID: 9518 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I've just finished my first WU on Windows XP Home with 185.85 WHQL and Boinc 6.6.28 with a GTS250 here (and the most recent beta 185.81 here) and my timestep has dramatically reduced to 47.36ms (42.65ms for the latest beta 185.81), which is the lowest I have ever had. The 185.xx drivers offer enhanced crunching/folding performance, but I wasn't aware that there maybe a bit of an increase with these 185.85 drivers. Lately I've been busy with the crashing/hanging WUs, so I haven't had the opportunity to check much else out. On my i7 rig the 185.xx have been a nightmare. This 185.85 driver runs and the only issue that I am having is it always resets the display to 12??x??? instead of the 1024x768 that I use (still on a 19" LCD here). Still an improvement in performance over the pre-185.xx drivers. I'm just hoping something shows up soon that will run 100% on this rig. My other rigs (775) don't have any issues with 185.xx drivers.... | |
ID: 9520 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
The problems with the units only involve the cards not being a 2XX. It's not these drivers that are causing the crashing that you are refering to.... It may be the WUs or the insufficient memory of the lower end cards....they don't know, but those WUs are crashing regardless of which driver is used.... | |
ID: 9522 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
.. and my timestep has dramatically reduced to 47.36ms (42.65ms for the latest beta 185.81), which is the lowest I have ever had. WUs with different names and different credits likely feature different complexity (i.e. number of atoms) and differ in the time per step. A bit less than 50 ms used to be pretty normal for my 9800GTX+ last autumn. Now most WUs take longer, but not all of them. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 9552 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Always errors for me... | |
ID: 9557 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I only have a few lags on my Hauppauge TV card, picture and sound stopped for 2sec after that running in slow motion, not seen this on 182.50. | |
ID: 9593 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Anyone else seeing a 2-3% slowdown on v185.85 compared with v185.66? | |
ID: 9626 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
There seems to be a driver issue with old cards and new cuda 2.2 drivers. Maybe an incompatibility with the 2.1 toolkit. | |
ID: 9643 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Thanks for the information, this may very well explain some of the recently unusually high failure rates. | |
ID: 9651 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Thanks for the information, this may very well explain some of the recently unusually high failure rates. See this recent post: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=1034&nowrap=true#9655 Failed WUs and he is indeed using driver v182.50... | |
ID: 9656 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
You're right, that seems like the error. So we'd have to search for an older driver (too bad NV does not just say which CUDA version they support.. or, not that I could find it easily) or just wait it out. Since the project team removed the questionable WUs I didn't get any further errors. But then I only run 2 a day, hardly representative. | |
ID: 9686 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Well i have received a test unit so we gonna see if the driver is the issue. | |
ID: 9692 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Well i have received a test unit so we gonna see if the driver is the issue. The version reported by BOINC is the compute capability of the card, not the cuda version. They have reworded it from 6.6.24 onwards. What sort of card is it? ____________ BOINC blog | |
ID: 9702 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
9600 GT haven't found info anywhere what version of cuda is supported by it. | |
ID: 9706 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Hardware capabilities should be, right out of my head: | |
ID: 9786 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Yea i forgot indeed is 1.1 | |
ID: 9790 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
You might want to go into the Nvida control panel -> Help -> System information and just check what version it thinks it is. Apparently when I upgraded, while it went through the motions and rebooted it still thought it had the old drivers. | |
ID: 9797 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Whell, I was using 182.08 and it works grat. | |
ID: 10052 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I come back with new problems : 22/05/2009 01:17:16 Starting BOINC client version 6.6.28 for windows_x86_64 The GTX260 don't appear (and only one thread run) and all my wus go in errors like 22/05/2009 09:42:02 GPUGRID Computation for task p1270000-IBUCH_pYIpYVk1_2105-0-10-RND0895_1 finished Then I upgrade driver Nvidia to 185.85, and I have still the pb. | |
ID: 10068 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
- you used 6.6.20, not 6.6.2 ;) | |
ID: 10070 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
That would be <cc_config> <options> <use_all_gpus>1</use_all_gpus> </options> </cc_config> ____________ ![]() pixelicious.at - my little photoblog | |
ID: 10072 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Thanks, but i don't find a cc_config. :/ | |
ID: 10075 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
You have to create it yourself...just text, but save it as... | |
ID: 10077 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
You have to create it yourself...just text, but save it as... Yes it does ... | |
ID: 10079 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
and Gpugrid stay in waiting. What's the exact message why it is waiting? MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 10087 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Look : | |
ID: 10107 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I find the solution : | |
ID: 10113 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
In the sticky thread regarding this "problem" paul says that from 6.6.20 up you have to manually switch this settign (if you want you GPU to run when you work).. so I assumed you already knew about this, since you've been using 6.6.20. Was the change introduced later on? | |
ID: 10123 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
In the sticky thread regarding this "problem" paul says that from 6.6.20 up you have to manually switch this settign (if you want you GPU to run when you work).. so I assumed you already knew about this, since you've been using 6.6.20. Was the change introduced later on? In 6.6.20 I don't see this message. | |
ID: 10128 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Yes, but did you have to set the preference manually? Is it there at all? (sorry, I'd take a look myself if I'd use 6.6.20) | |
ID: 10129 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
on this version their are 2 really nasty bugs | |
ID: 10133 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| |
ID: 10138 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Sorry that I have to ask again: is this 6.6.20 or 6.6.28? I know it should look like this in 6.6.28, but I thought it would also have to look like this in 6.6.20. And in this case you would have had to switch the "use GPU while computer is in use" before and forgot about it when you upgraded. | |
ID: 10142 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
It's boinc 6.6.28. | |
ID: 10145 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I've updated to the new 185.85 WHPQL driver and my GTX 260 works fine. | |
ID: 10165 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I'd say a few percent. | |
ID: 10172 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Sorry that I have to ask again: is this 6.6.20 or 6.6.28? I know it should look like this in 6.6.28, but I thought it would also have to look like this in 6.6.20. And in this case you would have had to switch the "use GPU while computer is in use" before and forgot about it when you upgraded. Actually 6.6.20 had it as well. The difference was it defaulted to being ticked up to and including 20. From 6.6.21 it defaulted to blank. ____________ BOINC blog | |
ID: 10184 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Actually 6.6.20 had it as well. The difference was it defaulted to being ticked up to and including 20. From 6.6.21 it defaulted to blank. Ah thanks, that exactly what I wanted to hear. So instead of Note that for 6.6.20 and up, GPU users have the toggle "use gpu while computer is in use", disabled by default in 6.6.2.0 and up the text in the sticky should read Note that for 6.6.21 and up, GPU users have the toggle "use gpu while computer is in use", disabled by default in 6.6.21 and up EDIT: ah, that's actually just what you said in the 3rd post in that thread.. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 10212 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
i hav nvidia 158.85...how can i upgrade it to 185.85?? | |
ID: 10330 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
... how can i upgrade ... You start simply a downloaded driver package, opt in the right product and operating system: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us If you have problems with the newest WHQL-driver, download an older package and try it again. Did you check whether your NVIDIA card is listed in the FAQs ? Overview of cards that run the GPUGRID application | |
ID: 10352 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I test, and I have again the same errors, like 185.66, 185.68. Same problem with 186.18. :/ | |
ID: 10860 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : new driver 185.85 WHQL