Advanced search

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta 6.22 for Windows (Fermi too)

Author Message
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1947
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 16079 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 9:23:34 UTC

We have tested locally and this version works for us.
Still 30% faster over current application on G200 cards.

gdf
PS: if all works Fermi application coming out in the afternoon.

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16082 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 10:37:40 UTC - in response to Message 16079.
Last modified: 30 Mar 2010 | 10:45:49 UTC

We have tested locally and this version works for us.
Still 30% faster over current application on G200 cards.

gdf
PS: if all works Fermi application coming out in the afternoon.


Picked up 3 tonight. 2 out of 3 crashed after about 15 seconds. Third is still going.

SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel [mshake_position_kernel_1] [2] [10,1,1][64,1,1]
Assertion failed: 0, file swanlib_nv.cpp, line 281

1st wu
2nd wu

Both gave a windows pop-up saying task has stopped responding. BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64, Driver 196.21
____________
BOINC blog

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,212,810,943
RAC: 190
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16086 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 16:22:07 UTC

Tried to crunch two tasks:

1. Host ID: 31329 - WinXP x64 GTX260 65nm, driver 19713, one of unusable GTX260 cards for GPUGRID. Underclocked according to basic settings by wiki - the card is factory OCed. The task erroed out after 2,972s. Very low CPU load (max. 8% of one core used).


<core_client_version>6.10.36</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260"
# Clock rate: 1.24 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 27
# Number of cores: 216
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel sync [reduce_kernel4] [702]
Assertion failed: 0, file swanlib_nv.cpp, line 121

This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information.

</stderr_txt>
]]>


2. Host ID 38345 - Win XP x86, 9600 GT, driver 19562, a little OCed. No problem when crunchig 6.03 tasks. The task errored out after 230s.

<core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT"
# Clock rate: 1.62 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 536543232 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 8
# Number of cores: 64
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
# Time per step (avg over 5000 steps): 45.297 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 226.484 s
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1947
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 16087 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 16:35:53 UTC - in response to Message 16086.


It did not error out. It finished successfully!
The application seems to be working fine.

g

Tried to crunch two tasks:

1. Host ID: 31329 - WinXP x64 GTX260 65nm, driver 19713, one of unusable GTX260 cards for GPUGRID. Underclocked according to basic settings by wiki - the card is factory OCed. The task erroed out after 2,972s. Very low CPU load (max. 8% of one core used).

<core_client_version>6.10.36</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260"
# Clock rate: 1.24 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 27
# Number of cores: 216
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel sync [reduce_kernel4] [702]
Assertion failed: 0, file swanlib_nv.cpp, line 121

This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information.

</stderr_txt>
]]>


2. Host ID 38345 - Win XP x86, 9600 GT, driver 19562, a little OCed. No problem when crunchig 6.03 tasks. The task errored out after 230s.

<core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT"
# Clock rate: 1.62 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 536543232 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 8
# Number of cores: 64
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
# Time per step (avg over 5000 steps): 45.297 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 226.484 s
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,212,810,943
RAC: 190
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16088 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 17:15:16 UTC - in response to Message 16087.
Last modified: 30 Mar 2010 | 17:15:48 UTC

You are right GDF, claimed 18.73, granted 28.09 for 280s elapsed time. Very high credit for 9600 GT, nice.
Sorry for my thoughtlessness, wall-clock time 280s is unexpected for succefully finished task.

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16090 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 20:42:24 UTC - in response to Message 16082.

Picked up 3 tonight. 2 out of 3 crashed after about 15 seconds. Third is still going.


Third one completed successfully. Link is here
____________
BOINC blog

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16091 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 21:33:04 UTC - in response to Message 16088.

For what it's worth,
6h and 3h into 6.22 runs on two seperate systems that use GT240s.
Estimated run time 11h and 13h roughly.

SuperViruS
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 8
Credit: 127,707,074
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16092 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 21:59:53 UTC

1st beta 6.22 WU completed. ^^

http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=2073498

Approximately 3000 seconds faster on my GTX 275, a performance increase of 16%

Good work!!
____________

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1947
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 16094 - Posted: 30 Mar 2010 | 23:05:22 UTC - in response to Message 16092.

cuda30 version is also out now. This should work on Fermi.

gdf

Profile Aardvark
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Nov 08
Posts: 28
Credit: 82,362,324
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16096 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 1:20:05 UTC - in response to Message 16094.

Success.

Two completed results taking approximately 19 & 20 minutes each.

Windows 7, i7 920, 2X GTX260 (55nm, 216 core).

Running 8 cpu tasks simultaneously.

2076209 1307386 31 Mar 2010 0:37:59 UTC 31 Mar 2010 1:09:04 UTC Completed and validated 1,221.97 207.51 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)

2076073 1307228 31 Mar 2010 0:20:28 UTC 31 Mar 2010 1:07:05 UTC Completed and validated 1,144.30 198.67 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)

Using about 15% of one cpu thread (about 2% of total cpu)per WU.

This is the best I've seen yet.

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,212,810,943
RAC: 190
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16097 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 6:19:38 UTC - in response to Message 16094.
Last modified: 31 Mar 2010 | 6:21:01 UTC

6.22 cuda 3.0 erroed out (both GTX260 and 9600GT).
ID 31329


<core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260"
# Clock rate: 1.24 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 27
# Number of cores: 216
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
</stderr_txt>
]]>

ID 38345

<core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -40 (0xffffffd8)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT"
# Clock rate: 1.62 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 536543232 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 8
# Number of cores: 64
SWAN : Module load result [.fastfill.cu.] [200]
SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed
</stderr_txt>
]]>

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,212,810,943
RAC: 190
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16098 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 7:00:26 UTC - in response to Message 16097.
Last modified: 31 Mar 2010 | 7:02:03 UTC

nenym wrote:
6.22 cuda 3.0 erroed out (both GTX260 and 9600GT).

6.22 cuda 3.0 works fine on GTX260 now, wow. The first task finished on my weird GTX260 after updating from 181.xx drivers.

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,212,810,943
RAC: 190
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16099 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 8:17:14 UTC

After updating 9600GT drivers to WHQL 197.13 6.22 cuda 3.0 runs fine.

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16100 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 12:01:52 UTC

What's the oldest driver required for the CUDA 3.0 app?

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1947
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 16101 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 12:10:10 UTC - in response to Message 16100.

It gets shipped only if you have 197.13.

gdf

Profile X-Files 27
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 08
Posts: 95
Credit: 68,023,693
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16106 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 17:59:21 UTC - in response to Message 16101.

6.22 cuda and cuda3.0 works fine although I'd like to test cuda3.0 on a full blown WU (not the shorties).

The 6.22 cuda doesnt seem to give any performance boost on GTX 295 (2003572)
____________

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16108 - Posted: 31 Mar 2010 | 21:12:01 UTC - in response to Message 16101.

It gets shipped only if you have 197.13.

gdf


Cuda toolkit 3 was supported from 195.62 drivers onwards. You could give the cuda 3 DLL's to machines with this or later.
____________
BOINC blog

cristipurdel
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 10
Posts: 45
Credit: 103,429,292
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 16114 - Posted: 1 Apr 2010 | 11:46:34 UTC
Last modified: 1 Apr 2010 | 11:51:16 UTC

Just finished my 1 WU
http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=2082769
Really surprised to see that the system wasn't too lagy when I ran medium graphics software while crunching.
So far it seams to be on par with Collatz, thinking of system responsiveness, and much better than SETI or Einstein.
Really happy I could put the FX 580 Quadro to work, and doing currently only ACEMD beta :)

Bedrich Hajek
Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 411
Credit: 6,063,938,459
RAC: 14
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16123 - Posted: 2 Apr 2010 | 2:54:14 UTC - in response to Message 16101.

It gets shipped only if you have 197.13.

gdf



This is not correct. My computer downloaded 2 of these units and I am running version 195.62. They both crashed after about 2 seconds.

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16125 - Posted: 2 Apr 2010 | 7:09:44 UTC - in response to Message 16123.

It gets shipped only if you have 197.13.

gdf



This is not correct. My computer downloaded 2 of these units and I am running version 195.62. They both crashed after about 2 seconds.


If you read a couple of posts further up I mentioned that according to to nvidia 195.62 supports cuda toolkit 3. Its likely the guys changed it so we get the the cuda 3 DLL's and beta app.

It may be that the latest cuda 3 toolkit doesn't work properly with 195.62, but it may with later drivers. I have 196 drivers, but haven't picked up any beta work since the cuda 3 version came out. I will see if I can get one.

Its also possible its a bug with the beta app and nothing to do with the driver version.
____________
BOINC blog

Profile X-Files 27
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 08
Posts: 95
Credit: 68,023,693
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16141 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 | 8:56:29 UTC - in response to Message 16125.

4 success and 2 failed on cuda30

2087571 1314084 2 Apr 2010 9:37:39 UTC 2 Apr 2010 15:34:03 UTC Completed and validated 1,108.61 164.94 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)
2082414 1310891 1 Apr 2010 6:33:05 UTC 1 Apr 2010 12:37:15 UTC Completed and validated 1,064.81 159.25 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)
2077883 1308284 31 Mar 2010 7:58:55 UTC 31 Mar 2010 15:16:34 UTC Completed and validated 975.61 148.11 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)
2076183 1307270 31 Mar 2010 0:05:29 UTC 31 Mar 2010 12:05:04 UTC Completed and validated 2,063.01 161.27 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)
2089792 1314038 2 Apr 2010 21:26:56 UTC 3 Apr 2010 3:06:14 UTC Error while computing 1.00 0.92 0.01 --- ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)
2091989 1314836 3 Apr 2010 8:14:39 UTC 3 Apr 2010 8:50:54 UTC Error while computing 1.07 0.84 0.01 --- ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda30)

____________

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 216
Credit: 16,778,141,580
RAC: 1,565,928
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16142 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 | 9:49:32 UTC - in response to Message 16141.

In the last 2 days I've had 12 failures against 12 successes. All using 197.13 driver.

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16143 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 | 10:52:11 UTC

Updated drivers on one machine to 197.13 and managed to get one 6.22 beta which promptly crashed. Link to wu is here

BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64 and drivers 197.13
____________
BOINC blog

jjwhalen
Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 09
Posts: 29
Credit: 17,591,899
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16153 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 | 20:40:18 UTC

WU 1314836 died on my Intel quad/GTS250 after 2.39sec ET. I notice it had already crashed on 3 other hosts. Maybe not quite ready for prime time;)
____________

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16155 - Posted: 3 Apr 2010 | 22:42:47 UTC - in response to Message 16143.
Last modified: 4 Apr 2010 | 2:35:35 UTC

Updated drivers on one machine to 197.13 and managed to get one 6.22 beta which promptly crashed. Link to wu is here

BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64 and drivers 197.13


Make that 2 crashed straight away. Link to 2nd wu is here

Card is a GTX275.
____________
BOINC blog

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16157 - Posted: 4 Apr 2010 | 2:33:56 UTC

Got another one that also died immediately. Different machine this time. Everybody who has received it has bombed out too. Link to wu is here

BOINC 6.10.43, Win7 x64, 196.21 drivers, GTX295 card this time.
____________
BOINC blog

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1947
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 16158 - Posted: 4 Apr 2010 | 8:48:03 UTC - in response to Message 16157.
Last modified: 5 Apr 2010 | 17:19:36 UTC

I removed the CUDA3 application. Let's see if it's just the problem of CUDA3 not being ready. The CUDA2 application should be working as before.

gdf

Profile X-Files 27
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 08
Posts: 95
Credit: 68,023,693
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16181 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010 | 23:07:41 UTC

If all goes well would we see 3 plan classes (cuda,cuda23,cuda30)? maybe 2?
or just 1? if more than 1, how would the system select the best plan class for a specific device?

Currently in this beta I've only seen 1 plan class at a time.
____________

Profile X-Files 27
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 08
Posts: 95
Credit: 68,023,693
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16200 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010 | 13:09:23 UTC

No errors here, running cuda2.
____________

Snow Crash
Send message
Joined: 4 Apr 09
Posts: 450
Credit: 539,316,349
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16216 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010 | 22:40:14 UTC

Two just completed without error.
____________
Thanks - Steve

cristipurdel
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 10
Posts: 45
Credit: 103,429,292
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 16232 - Posted: 10 Apr 2010 | 7:22:37 UTC

I think I did 30 WUs with Completed and validated, 7 WUs with Error while computing but most of them were under a few seconds. The beta application runs pretty smooth, only thing is if I restart boinc while it processes an WU, the WU restarts. Apart from that, it's stable.

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1947
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 16233 - Posted: 10 Apr 2010 | 8:11:35 UTC - in response to Message 16232.

I think I did 30 WUs with Completed and validated, 7 WUs with Error while computing but most of them were under a few seconds. The beta application runs pretty smooth, only thing is if I restart boinc while it processes an WU, the WU restarts. Apart from that, it's stable.


Yes, there is a small mistake in the WU itself.
I think that next week we may deploy the beta application as the normal application.


gdf

Betting Slip
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 09
Posts: 670
Credit: 2,498,095,550
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16235 - Posted: 10 Apr 2010 | 8:50:40 UTC - in response to Message 16233.

I have had 2 and both errored and everyone else who did these units also errored.
Unlss you can pinpoint something within these specific WU's I don't think it's ready for release but it's your project.


____________
Radio Caroline, the world's most famous offshore pirate radio station.
Great music since April 1964. Support Radio Caroline Team -
Radio Caroline

cristipurdel
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 10
Posts: 45
Credit: 103,429,292
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 16246 - Posted: 12 Apr 2010 | 5:31:59 UTC - in response to Message 16233.


Yes, there is a small mistake in the WU itself.
I think that next week we may deploy the beta application as the normal application.

gdf


Does the ACEMD beta version v6.22 (cuda) application crunch the same WU as the ACEMD - GPU molecular dynamics v6.03 (cuda) application?
That would be a powerful speedup.

ftpd
Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 08
Posts: 152
Credit: 328,250,382
RAC: 0
Level
Asp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16248 - Posted: 12 Apr 2010 | 7:23:00 UTC

Received yesterday evening 1 WU (1350013). No errors - time 9 min 43 sec.
Boinc 6.10.45 GTX 295 197.13 xp-pro

Very small WU????
____________
Ton (ftpd) Netherlands

Profile X-Files 27
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 08
Posts: 95
Credit: 68,023,693
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16293 - Posted: 13 Apr 2010 | 22:06:07 UTC

Today's test was a success (5 WU) without a hitch.
____________

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1947
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 16295 - Posted: 14 Apr 2010 | 9:39:10 UTC - in response to Message 16248.

Received yesterday evening 1 WU (1350013). No errors - time 9 min 43 sec.
Boinc 6.10.45 GTX 295 197.13 xp-pro

Very small WU????



Yes, they are small, just for testing.

gdf

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16297 - Posted: 14 Apr 2010 | 11:23:16 UTC
Last modified: 14 Apr 2010 | 12:50:15 UTC

Did 4 today. 2 failed. Everybody else who got the 1st failure wu also crashed. Link to 1st wu here

Mine ran on a GTX295, Win7 x64, 196.21 drivers.
____________
BOINC blog

pwolfe
Send message
Joined: 24 Mar 09
Posts: 54
Credit: 16,186,927
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwat
Message 16318 - Posted: 16 Apr 2010 | 3:02:13 UTC - in response to Message 16297.

Would love to be able to test my fermi cards on linux. nudge nudge.

I just recieve the message no work available.

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta 6.22 for Windows (Fermi too)

//