Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Relation run time -> Credit

Author Message
Profile leprechaun
Send message
Joined: 22 Jun 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 45,224,378
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 21969 - Posted: 6 Sep 2011 | 16:54:49 UTC

Big differences in proportion to the run time of single WU with the Credits has struck me
Example normal WU:

286 IBUCH Runtime 10.568 sec Credits 4.157
159 KASHIF Runtime 14.960 sec Credits 8.893
427 KASHIF Runtime 16.738 sec Credits 19.233
For about 6,000 sec more run time there is nearly 5 times more in Credits. This is the disproportion.

With Long run WU is no significant difference.

One more thing has struck me. If I make about one browser play GPU Load often decreases up to 8% or almost up to the shutdown. Close or minimise I the browser window it goes again normally. Driver is 275.33.

Profile Saenger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jul 08
Posts: 134
Credit: 23,657,183
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwat
Message 21970 - Posted: 6 Sep 2011 | 17:09:36 UTC - in response to Message 21969.
Last modified: 6 Sep 2011 | 17:09:52 UTC

Big differences in proportion to the run time of single WU with the Credits has struck me

Moin Werner,

I've lust asked a similar question here, and got kind of an answer.

I can't say anything about the browser problem though.
____________
Gruesse vom Saenger

For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki

Profile leprechaun
Send message
Joined: 22 Jun 09
Posts: 8
Credit: 45,224,378
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 21971 - Posted: 6 Sep 2011 | 17:17:08 UTC

Thank you Uwe. I hadn't seen the contribution.
With Foldimg@home the problem with the browser doesn't appear. GPU Load always 99%.

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Relation run time -> Credit

//