error on vistax64

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : error on vistax64

Author	Message
Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1505 - Posted: 18 Aug 2008 \| 3:34:26 UTC
	i wanted to do some computing with mi graka, but i dont get work and 3 error messages Message from server: no work sent Message from server: full-atom molecular dynamics for Cell processor is not available for your type... Message from server: Full-atom molecular dynamics is not available for your type of computer what can i do? i have a q6600 and a 9800gx2 and the 177.35 drivers for cuda
	ID: 1505 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1506 - Posted: 18 Aug 2008 \| 3:57:58 UTC - in response to Message 1505.
	i wanted to do some computing with mi graka, but i dont get work and 3 error messages Message from server: no work sent Message from server: full-atom molecular dynamics for Cell processor is not available for your type... Message from server: Full-atom molecular dynamics is not available for your type of computer what can i do? i have a q6600 and a 9800gx2 and the 177.35 drivers for cuda Which version of BOINC do you use? You'll need a version > 6.3.5 to use your GPU for BOINC. The newest version is now 6.3.8 and can be downloaded here. But I just saw you use Vista 64, so you'll have to wait for a new BOINC version because on BOINC 6.3.8 the client is crashing at startup... ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1506 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1559 - Posted: 20 Aug 2008 \| 7:52:33 UTC
	when will the new boinc be released? my gx2 is so bored^^
	ID: 1559 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1569 - Posted: 20 Aug 2008 \| 15:43:47 UTC
	Sorry, I don't know. I'm also waiting for a working 64bit Client... ;) ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1569 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1598 - Posted: 21 Aug 2008 \| 23:35:04 UTC Last modified: 21 Aug 2008 \| 23:43:42 UTC
	just downloaded 6.3.9 but x64 still wont work -.- i also tried the 32bit version of boinc. the 6.3.8 and 6.3.9 are running, but dont get work from ps3grid -.- same report as in first post
	ID: 1598 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1599 - Posted: 22 Aug 2008 \| 2:39:01 UTC Last modified: 22 Aug 2008 \| 2:40:44 UTC
	Does BOINC recognize the coprocessor? At BOINC startup you should see something like CUDA devices found Coprocessor: GeForce ... in the messages tab of the BOINC Manager. ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1599 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1642 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 10:07:47 UTC - in response to Message 1599.
	no there is nothing no CUDA devices... no coprocessors in 6.3.9 for x86 (nonx64) what can i do?
	ID: 1642 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1645 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 10:37:52 UTC
	I think I read that 6.3.10 contains the fix. 6.3.9. was already too far when the fix arrived. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 1645 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1647 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 12:12:58 UTC - in response to Message 1645.
	is 6.3.10 already available?
	ID: 1647 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1649 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 12:44:51 UTC
	No, not yet, but it should be available later today or tomorrow... ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1649 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

UBT - NaRyan Send message Joined: 16 Jul 08 Posts: 68 Credit: 1,242,980 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1652 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 19:28:53 UTC - in response to Message 1649.
	Boinc v6.3,10 WIN x86 Boinc v6.3.10 WIN x64 ____________ Down with the Kredit Kops!!!
	ID: 1652 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1653 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 19:31:15 UTC - in response to Message 1652.
	Boinc v6.3,10 WIN x86 Boinc v6.3.10 WIN x64 just tried with the x64, it receives work but in less than 1 minute there is a calculation error -.- gpu is not oc atm
	ID: 1653 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1654 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 19:57:09 UTC Last modified: 23 Aug 2008 \| 19:57:57 UTC
	Guess we'll have to wait for the next version... ;) BOINC is now running, but it doesn't recognize the coprocessor and GPU tasks error out immediately. It only shows - CUDA devices found Coprocessor: device emulation (CPU)(1) which seems not right to me... Anyway, I just sent a bug report to BOINC Alpha and GDF, let's see what they can do for us. ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1654 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1656 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 21:06:27 UTC
	On XP 32 I also had my WUs fail within a minute, but using driver 177.35 seems to have solved it (see seperate thread). Maybe that could help you guys as well? MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 1656 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1657 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 21:12:50 UTC
	I don't think so. BOINC should show a GTX260 and not the device emulation on my computer... I think there's still something wrong with the CUDA detection on Vista64. ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1657 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

UBT - NaRyan Send message Joined: 16 Jul 08 Posts: 68 Credit: 1,242,980 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1661 - Posted: 23 Aug 2008 \| 21:59:05 UTC - in response to Message 1654.
	Guess we'll have to wait for the next version... ;) BOINC is now running, but it doesn't recognize the coprocessor and GPU tasks error out immediately. It only shows - CUDA devices found Coprocessor: device emulation (CPU)(1) which seems not right to me... Anyway, I just sent a bug report to BOINC Alpha and GDF, let's see what they can do for us. Yeah that means it's trying to use software (CPU) to run the CUDA prog :( ____________ Down with the Kredit Kops!!!
	ID: 1661 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1671 - Posted: 24 Aug 2008 \| 8:57:34 UTC
	yea think the same. because when it´s calculating on ps3 i cant "hear" my card it´s not working
	ID: 1671 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1806 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008 \| 21:03:07 UTC - in response to Message 1654.
	Guess we'll have to wait for the next version... ;) BOINC is now running, but it doesn't recognize the coprocessor and GPU tasks error out immediately. It only shows - CUDA devices found Coprocessor: device emulation (CPU)(1) which seems not right to me... Anyway, I just sent a bug report to BOINC Alpha and GDF, let's see what they can do for us. I am havving this same issue, is there any way to get this right? I have driver version 177.92 With an 8600GT GPU. The Folding@Home GPU client seems to work just fine on this setup
	ID: 1806 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1807 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008 \| 21:13:05 UTC - in response to Message 1806. Last modified: 27 Aug 2008 \| 21:13:36 UTC
	Guess we'll have to wait for the next version... ;) BOINC is now running, but it doesn't recognize the coprocessor and GPU tasks error out immediately. It only shows - CUDA devices found Coprocessor: device emulation (CPU)(1) which seems not right to me... Anyway, I just sent a bug report to BOINC Alpha and GDF, let's see what they can do for us. I am havving this same issue, is there any way to get this right? I have driver version 177.92 With an 8600GT GPU. The Folding@Home GPU client seems to work just fine on this setup Operating system, still vista64? gdf
	ID: 1807 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1809 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008 \| 21:22:46 UTC - in response to Message 1807.
	Guess we'll have to wait for the next version... ;) BOINC is now running, but it doesn't recognize the coprocessor and GPU tasks error out immediately. It only shows - CUDA devices found Coprocessor: device emulation (CPU)(1) which seems not right to me... Anyway, I just sent a bug report to BOINC Alpha and GDF, let's see what they can do for us. I am havving this same issue, is there any way to get this right? I have driver version 177.92 With an 8600GT GPU. The Folding@Home GPU client seems to work just fine on this setup Operating system, still vista64? gdf Yup, Vista64, could this be the problem?
	ID: 1809 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>HFR>RR] Jim PROFIT Send message Joined: 3 Jun 07 Posts: 107 Credit: 31,331,137 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1813 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008 \| 23:16:00 UTC
	I have the same issue with both Vista 32 and 64. I try to upgrade to the last drivers, but nothing change. Jim PROFIT
	ID: 1813 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1814 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008 \| 23:29:28 UTC - in response to Message 1813.
	I have the same issue with both Vista 32 and 64. I try to upgrade to the last drivers, but nothing change. Jim PROFIT Please try to run this program from within the projects/www.ps3grid.net dir on command line and send me the result (via private message if you prefer). http://multiscalelab.org/grid/en/HelpNvidiaGPU?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=deviceQuery.exe gdf
	ID: 1814 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1819 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 6:59:02 UTC - in response to Message 1814. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 6:59:48 UTC
	I have the same issue with both Vista 32 and 64. I try to upgrade to the last drivers, but nothing change. Jim PROFIT Please try to run this program from within the projects/www.ps3grid.net dir on command line and send me the result (via private message if you prefer). http://multiscalelab.org/grid/en/HelpNvidiaGPU?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=deviceQuery.exe gdf To bad, it doesn't work on Vista 64 bit --------------------------- deviceQuery.exe - Application Error --------------------------- The application failed to initialize properly (0xc000007b). Click OK to terminate the application. --------------------------- OK ---------------------------
	ID: 1819 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1820 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 7:06:50 UTC
	Weird... Have you copied the .exe in the www.ps3grid.net dir ? It also doesn't run on my Vista64 PC, but I got an error message about a missing cutil32.dll... ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1820 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1822 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 8:09:30 UTC - in response to Message 1820. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 8:26:03 UTC
	Weird... Have you copied the .exe in the www.ps3grid.net dir ? It also doesn't run on my Vista64 PC, but I got an error message about a missing cutil32.dll... I think I have to try that one, when I get back home... as through RemoteDesktop CUDA/GPU is not available. !!edit!! I have this same error, so first we need the DLL and then we can test... !!edit2!! I found that the cutil32.dll is part of the CUDA SDK (as it seems) perhaps try to install that one to. !!edit3!! I installed the CUDA SDK, and the deviceQuery.exe is a part of it, I am able to run this, so when I get back home I can run it to see what comes back, as the GPU is not available through RemoteDesktop
	ID: 1822 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1825 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 8:28:11 UTC
	Boinc 6.3.10 work fine on vista x64 SP1 on my computer, how can I help you to determine where comes the problem from?
	ID: 1825 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1826 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 8:32:46 UTC
	Robinsky have you installed the 32bit or 64 bit SDK? I installed the 64bit SDK but could only find a cutil64.dll in ...\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\EmuRelease\ ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1826 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1828 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 8:41:42 UTC - in response to Message 1825.
	Boinc 6.3.10 work fine on vista x64 SP1 on my computer, how can I help you to determine where comes the problem from? Run the same exe please: http://www.multiscalelab.org/grid/en/HelpNvidiaGPU#preview You need the cudart.dll distributed with the application, not the one distributed with BOINC and cutil32.dll which is downloadable from the page above. gdf
	ID: 1828 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1829 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 9:01:34 UTC
	Here is the result There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 1 Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 8 Number of cores: 64 Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes Total amount of shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers available per block: 8192 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x 512 x 64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 1.95 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: No Test PASSED Press ENTER to exit...
	ID: 1829 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1831 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 9:15:25 UTC - in response to Message 1829. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 9:17:12 UTC
	[quote]Here is the result There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce 9600 GT" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 1 These fields are important. Device emulation had Major number < 1. The Device name is what is reported by BOINC. Let's see what is for the others. gdf
	ID: 1831 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1832 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 9:22:41 UTC
	On my computer it showed - Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" major revision number: 3 minor revision number: 1242000 ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1832 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1834 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 9:49:26 UTC - in response to Message 1832. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 9:51:39 UTC
	On my computer it showed - Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" major revision number: 3 minor revision number: 1242000 Which is wrong. Can you paste the all text here to see if even the other fields are wrong? Can we have some more users reports? Also it would be interesting to try the 64 bit version of deviceQuery.exe for Windows, if anyone can compile the CUDA SDK using the CUDA toolkit on a 64 bit windows, deviceQuery is in the SDK. gdf
	ID: 1834 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1835 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 9:59:05 UTC Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:00:14 UTC
	I already sent you an email with the full output of the deviceQuery, but here it is again... ;) C:\Users\Stefan>cd /D F:\\ProgramData\BOINC\projects\www.ps3grid.net F:\ProgramData\BOINC\projects\www.ps3grid.net>deviceQuery.exe There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" Major revision number: 3 Minor revision number: 1242000 Total amount of global memory: 939524096 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 1572544 Number of cores: 12580352 Total amount of constant memory: 1 bytes Total amount of shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers available per block: 16384 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x 512 x 64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 0.07 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: Yes Test PASSED Press ENTER to exit... I never compiled anything, but if you can give me a step by step instruction, I could give it a try if no one else which is more experienced with such things can do it... ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1835 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1836 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:05:07 UTC - in response to Message 1826. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:08:53 UTC
	Robinsky have you installed the 32bit or 64 bit SDK? I installed the 64bit SDK but could only find a cutil64.dll in ...\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\EmuRelease\ I installed the 64bit, which has a 64.dll, but in the SDK\bin\win64\Release\ folder you can find the deviceQuery.exe which works, so it is better to run this one. EDIT.. No need to compile it yourself, as it is available. I might be able to provide the deveiceQuery and perhaps supporting dll's if needed, but you might just install the CUDA SDK and have it available and working.
	ID: 1836 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1838 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:30:08 UTC - in response to Message 1836.
	Robinsky have you installed the 32bit or 64 bit SDK? I installed the 64bit SDK but could only find a cutil64.dll in ...\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\EmuRelease\ I installed the 64bit, which has a 64.dll, but in the SDK\bin\win64\Release\ folder you can find the deviceQuery.exe which works, so it is better to run this one. EDIT.. No need to compile it yourself, as it is available. I might be able to provide the deveiceQuery and perhaps supporting dll's if needed, but you might just install the CUDA SDK and have it available and working. Even better, could people report the results of the 32 bit (provided above) and 64 bit application deviceQuery. gdf
	ID: 1838 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1839 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:43:07 UTC
	Ahh.. That's much easier... ;) Here's the output of the deviceQuery.exe in the 64 bit SDK - C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\Release>devi ceQuery.exe There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 3 Total amount of global memory: 939524096 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 24 Number of cores: 192 Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes Total amount of shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers available per block: 16384 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x 512 x 64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 1.24 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: No Test PASSED Press ENTER to exit... ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1839 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1840 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:46:27 UTC - in response to Message 1839.
	Ahh.. That's much easier... ;) Here's the output of the deviceQuery.exe in the 64 bit SDK - C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\Release>devi ceQuery.exe There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 3 Total amount of global memory: 939524096 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 24 Number of cores: 192 Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes Total amount of shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers available per block: 16384 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x 512 x 64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 1.24 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: No Test PASSED Press ENTER to exit...
	ID: 1840 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1841 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:49:00 UTC - in response to Message 1840.
	Ok, maybe we need to distribute a Win64 application. Even though, BOINC should work as it is 64 bit and links with the 64 bit cudart.dll. Stefan, which cudart.dll is using deviceQuery? The one from BOINC? gdf
	ID: 1841 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1842 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:59:05 UTC
	I don't think so, because as you can see in the path of my last post, I simply ran the deviceQuery.exe from the CUDA SDK dir... How can I tell which cudart.sll it is using? Here's the output from dependency walker/64bit deviceQuery.exe ***************************\| System Information \|************************* Dependency Walker: 2.2.6000 (64-bit) Operating System: Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate (64-bit) OS Version: 6.00.6001 Service Pack 1 Processor: Intel64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 7, GenuineIntel, ~2999MHz Number of Processors: 4, Mask: 0x000000000000000F Computer Name: KIM-554 User Name: Stefan Local Date: Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 Local Time: 12:54:07 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit (GMT+02:00) OS Language: 0x0C07: German (Austria) Memory Load: 53% Physical Memory Total: 2.145.644.544 (2047 MB) Physical Memory Used: 1.144.393.728 Physical Memory Free: 1.001.250.816 Page File Memory Total: 4.772.638.720 Page File Memory Used: 1.892.577.280 Page File Memory Free: 2.880.061.440 Virtual Memory Total: 8.796.092.891.136 Virtual Memory Used: 145.473.536 Virtual Memory Free: 8.795.947.417.600 Page Size: 0x00001000 (4.096) Allocation Granularity: 0x00010000 (65.536) Min. App. Address: 0x0000000000010000 (65.536) Max. App. Address: 0x000007FFFFFEFFFF (8.796.092.956.671) ****************************\| Search Order \|****************************** * * * Legend: F File E Error (path not valid) * * * ****************************************************************************** Side-by-Side components (Windows 2000/XP/2003/Vista/+) The system's "KnownDLLs" list [F ] c:\windows\system32\ADVAPI32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\CLBCATQ.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\COMCTL32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\COMDLG32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\GDI32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\IERTUTIL.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\IESETTING.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\IMAGEHLP.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\IMM32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\KERNEL32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\LPK.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\MSCTF.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\MSVCRT.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\NORMALIZ.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\NSI.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\NTDLL.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\OLE32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\OLEAUT32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\PSAPI.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\RPCRT4.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\SETUPAPI.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\SHELL32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\SHLWAPI.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\URLMON.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\USER32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\USP10.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\WININET.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\WLDAP32.DLL [F ] c:\windows\system32\WS2_32.DLL The application directory [ ] C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\Release\ The 32-bit system directory [ ] C:\Windows\system32\ The 16-bit system directory (Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/Vista/+) [ ] C:\Windows\system\ The system's root OS directory [ ] C:\Windows\ The application's registered "App Paths" directories The system's "PATH" environment variable directories [ ] C:\Windows\system32\ [ ] C:\Windows\ [ ] C:\Windows\System32\Wbem\ [ ] C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Ulead Systems\MPEG\ [ ] C:\CUDA\bin\ ***********************\| Module Dependency Tree \|************************* * * * Legend: F Forwarded Module ? Missing Module 6 64-bit Module * * D Delay Load Module ! Invalid Module * * * Dynamic Module E Import/Export Mismatch or Load Failure * * ^ Duplicate Module * * * ****************************************************************************** [ 6] DEVICEQUERY.EXE [ 6] CUDART.DLL [ ^6] KERNEL32.DLL [F^6] NTDLL.DLL [ 6] CUTIL64.DLL [ ^6] KERNEL32.DLL [F^6] NTDLL.DLL [ 6] KERNEL32.DLL [ 6] NTDLL.DLL [F^6] NTDLL.DLL ****************************\| Module List \|******************************* * * * Legend: D Delay Load Module ? Missing Module 6 64-bit Module * * * Dynamic Module ! Invalid Module * * E Import/Export Mismatch or Load Failure * * * ****************************************************************************** Module File Time Stamp Link Time Stamp File Size Attr. Link Checksum Real Checksum CPU Subsystem Symbols Preferred Base Actual Base Virtual Size Load Order File Ver Product Ver Image Ver Linker Ver OS Ver Subsystem Ver ----- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------- ----- ------------- ------------- --- --------- ------- ------------------ ----------- ------------ ---------- -------------- -------------- --------- ---------- ------ ------------- [ 6] CUDART.DLL 16.07.2008 13:29 16.07.2008 22:08 483.328 A 0x00000000 0x0007E117 x64 GUI None 0x0000000180000000 Unknown 0x0007B000 Not Loaded N/A N/A 0.0 8.0 4.0 5.2 [ 6] CUTIL64.DLL 11.08.2008 02:44 11.08.2008 11:44 390.656 A 0x00000000 0x0006B7BD x64 GUI CV 0x0000000010000000 Unknown 0x00065000 Not Loaded N/A N/A 0.0 8.0 4.0 5.2 [ 6] DEVICEQUERY.EXE 11.08.2008 02:53 11.08.2008 11:53 92.160 0x00022C22 0x00022C22 x64 Console None 0x0000000000400000 Unknown 0x0001C000 Not Loaded N/A N/A 0.0 8.0 4.0 5.2 [ 6] KERNEL32.DLL 21.01.2008 04:47 19.01.2008 09:58 1.213.952 A 0x00130B1B 0x00130B1B x64 Console CV 0x0000000078D40000 Unknown 0x0012B000 Not Loaded 6.0.6001.18000 6.0.6001.18000 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 [ 6] NTDLL.DLL 21.01.2008 04:49 19.01.2008 09:59 1.559.696 A 0x0018294E 0x0018294E x64 Console CV 0x0000000078E70000 Unknown 0x00180000 Not Loaded 6.0.6001.18000 6.0.6001.18000 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 ********************************\| Log \|*********************************** ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1842 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1843 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 10:59:39 UTC
	Were can I download the win64 DeviceQuery?
	ID: 1843 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1844 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 11:02:33 UTC Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 11:03:10 UTC
	From the CUDA download site. You need to download the CUDA SDK for your OS, install it and then run deviceQuery.exe from the CMD, which you can find in C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\Release\ ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1844 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1845 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 11:27:16 UTC
	Ok thanks It does not work, cudart.dll not found ...
	ID: 1845 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1846 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 11:49:16 UTC - in response to Message 1845.
	Ok thanks It does not work, cudart.dll not found ... You need to have CUDA Drivers (and perhaps the CUDA Toolkit) installed to!
	ID: 1846 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Wolfram1 Send message Joined: 24 Aug 08 Posts: 45 Credit: 3,431,862 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1847 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 11:53:47 UTC - in response to Message 1844.
	Here are my values: There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce 8400 GS" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 1 Total amount of global memory: 268435456 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 2 Number of cores: 16 Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes Totaö amount if shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers avaulable per block: 8192 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x512 x64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid:: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 0.92 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: No
	ID: 1847 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1848 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 12:00:00 UTC - in response to Message 1846.
	Ok thanks It does not work, cudart.dll not found ... You need to have CUDA Drivers (and perhaps the CUDA Toolkit) installed to! Yes thanks, but I know that :) Read the entire thread to understand
	ID: 1848 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1850 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 12:10:42 UTC - in response to Message 1847.
	Here are my values: There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce 8400 GS" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 1 Total amount of global memory: 268435456 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 2 Number of cores: 16 Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes Totaö amount if shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers avaulable per block: 8192 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x512 x64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid:: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 0.92 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: No Is this with the deviceQuery.exe provided by GDF, or with the 64bit deviceQuery.exe from the CUDA SDK? ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1850 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Wolfram1 Send message Joined: 24 Aug 08 Posts: 45 Credit: 3,431,862 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1851 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 12:38:36 UTC - in response to Message 1850.
	Is this with the deviceQuery.exe provided by GDF, or with the 64bit deviceQuery.exe from the CUDA SDK? This is with the 64bitdeviceQuery.exe from the CUDA SDK.
	ID: 1851 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1861 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 16:16:52 UTC Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 16:20:09 UTC
	Results for the 64bit version: C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\win64\Release>devi ceQuery.exe There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce 8600 GT" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 1 Total amount of global memory: 268435456 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 4 Number of cores: 32 Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes Total amount of shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers available per block: 8192 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x 512 x 64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 1.45 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: No AND with the 32bit version: C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\NVIDIA CUDA SDK\bin\Win32\Release>devi ceQuery.exe There is 1 device supporting CUDA Device 0: "GeForce 8600 GT" Major revision number: 1 Minor revision number: 1 Total amount of global memory: 268435456 bytes Number of multiprocessors: 4 Number of cores: 32 Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes Total amount of shared memory per block: 16384 bytes Total number of registers available per block: 8192 Warp size: 32 Maximum number of threads per block: 512 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a block: 512 x 512 x 64 Maximum sizes of each dimension of a grid: 65535 x 65535 x 1 Maximum memory pitch: 262144 bytes Texture alignment: 256 bytes Clock rate: 1.45 GHz Concurrent copy and execution: No
	ID: 1861 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1862 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 17:25:40 UTC
	My team mate solved his problem with vista64, he just reinstalled boinc
	ID: 1862 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Wolfram1 Send message Joined: 24 Aug 08 Posts: 45 Credit: 3,431,862 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1863 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 17:40:41 UTC - in response to Message 1862.
	My team mate solved his problem with vista64, he just reinstalled boinc Please explain it in detail!
	ID: 1863 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1864 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:14:21 UTC - in response to Message 1862. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:16:45 UTC
	My team mate solved his problem with vista64, he just reinstalled boinc Is it just as simple as reinstalling Boinc 6.3.10 !?!? Or are some other steps needed? Perhaps changing the account on which boinc runs, or something else? PS.. did he install the 64 bit version or the 32bit version of boinc?
	ID: 1864 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1865 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:32:55 UTC
	I think I have found the problem with BOINC and GPU computing. When boinc runs secured as boinc_master it is not able to see the GPU (Privilege problem), I just stopped the service and started boinc.exe manually as an administrator and am getting the right messages: 28-Aug-2008 20:30:09 [---] CUDA devices found 28-Aug-2008 20:30:09 [---] Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GT (1) So it seems to be a Vista privilege problem rather than a bug in the applications.
	ID: 1865 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1866 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:39:04 UTC - in response to Message 1864.
	Is it just as simple as reinstalling Boinc 6.3.10 !?!? Exactly, reinstalling without service, nothing more PS.. did he install the 64 bit version or the 32bit version of boinc? Of course, boinc x64 6.3.10 :D http://www.ps3grid.net/hosts_user.php?userid=5524
	ID: 1866 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1867 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:39:28 UTC - in response to Message 1865. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:40:11 UTC
	I think I have found the problem with BOINC and GPU computing. When boinc runs secured as boinc_master it is not able to see the GPU (Privilege problem), I just stopped the service and started boinc.exe manually as an administrator and am getting the right messages: 28-Aug-2008 20:30:09 [---] CUDA devices found 28-Aug-2008 20:30:09 [---] Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GT (1) So it seems to be a Vista privilege problem rather than a bug in the applications. Does the application run then if you start it manually? gdf
	ID: 1867 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1868 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:42:29 UTC - in response to Message 1867. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 18:50:55 UTC
	I think I have found the problem with BOINC and GPU computing. When boinc runs secured as boinc_master it is not able to see the GPU (Privilege problem), I just stopped the service and started boinc.exe manually as an administrator and am getting the right messages: 28-Aug-2008 20:30:09 [---] CUDA devices found 28-Aug-2008 20:30:09 [---] Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GT (1) So it seems to be a Vista privilege problem rather than a bug in the applications. Does the application run then if you start it manually? gdf Boinc is now processing a task, I am not sure if the task works correctly but it doesn't stop after 1 sec with an error. Only problem I have is that the task is using a lot of CPU, so there might still be a problem somehow!???? Haven't got the feeling the GPU is used, as I am not seeing much temperature increase, as I do see with Folding@Home. EDIT: It also slows down my computer very much, due to this CPU usage, Temperature of the GPU is slowly climbing up. I Guess there is still much work left to build a nice GPU application. EDIT2: I think I stop the application as it slows down my machine to much to be able to use it, hope this can be made better in the future. At least we found the problem of not be able to use the GPU with the service, now we need a fix!?
	ID: 1868 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1869 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 19:06:04 UTC - in response to Message 1868.
	can someone start boinc.exe manually and see if the application work correctly? There are still things which are odd, like the 32 bit deviceQuery issues. gdf
	ID: 1869 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>HFR>RR] Jim PROFIT Send message Joined: 3 Jun 07 Posts: 107 Credit: 31,331,137 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1870 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 19:24:02 UTC Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 19:32:58 UTC
	So after reading all the posts, i don't need to post the result of deviceQuery! But,on Vista 32 and 64, BOINC and deviceQuery saw only one card! And if i install Boinc without the "secure" option, Boinc show me CUDA devices found Coprocessor : GeForce GTX 280 (1) I can start with the service. So it's rally a problem with the secure option introduce with the 6.x version! Jim PROFIT EDIT : without the secure mode, BOINC is not starting as a service! I will try to find a way to do this!
	ID: 1870 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1871 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 20:10:57 UTC - in response to Message 1869.
	can someone start boinc.exe manually and see if the application work correctly? There are still things which are odd, like the 32 bit deviceQuery issues. gdf It seems to work correctly here. Only issues I have is that my computer gets really unresponsive due to a lot of CPU usage by the application. If I stop boinc and the application and run Folding@Home I don't have this issue so I guess a lot has to be done before this is usefull. I aborted the application as it will take to much time (8 hours) and I need my computer for other things.
	ID: 1871 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1872 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 20:12:22 UTC - in response to Message 1870.
	So after reading all the posts, i don't need to post the result of deviceQuery! But,on Vista 32 and 64, BOINC and deviceQuery saw only one card! And if i install Boinc without the "secure" option, Boinc show me CUDA devices found Coprocessor : GeForce GTX 280 (1) I can start with the service. So it's rally a problem with the secure option introduce with the 6.x version! Jim PROFIT EDIT : without the secure mode, BOINC is not starting as a service! I will try to find a way to do this! I guess the whole problem has to with BOINC running as a service. I might also be related to the secure option. At least we are able to run applications when we don't use the secure service mode.
	ID: 1872 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>HFR>RR] Jim PROFIT Send message Joined: 3 Jun 07 Posts: 107 Credit: 31,331,137 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1873 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 20:36:54 UTC - in response to Message 1872.
	I guess the whole problem has to with BOINC running as a service. I might also be related to the secure option. At least we are able to run applications when we don't use the secure service mode. I try to install it as a service and change to "Local System" and my account, but this is the same issue. So right now, we can't install it as a service. Maybe this is an issue with the security on the folders and files. Right now i don't have the time to test it, maybe tomorrow evening. Jim PROFIT
	ID: 1873 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1874 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 20:53:40 UTC - in response to Message 1873. Last modified: 28 Aug 2008 \| 20:54:06 UTC
	I guess the whole problem has to with BOINC running as a service. I might also be related to the secure option. At least we are able to run applications when we don't use the secure service mode. I try to install it as a service and change to "Local System" and my account, but this is the same issue. So right now, we can't install it as a service. Maybe this is an issue with the security on the folders and files. Right now i don't have the time to test it, maybe tomorrow evening. Jim PROFIT We are already in touch with the BOINC group and Nvidia on the issue. For now run it as you can... The slow display will be sorted in one of the next application version, but it is a direct consequence of the fact that our workunits are really things that you would run on a supercomputer, so they are heavier. gdf PS: I still don´t understand the deviceQuery issue...
	ID: 1874 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1875 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 21:00:19 UTC - in response to Message 1874.
	I guess the whole problem has to with BOINC running as a service. I might also be related to the secure option. At least we are able to run applications when we don't use the secure service mode. I try to install it as a service and change to "Local System" and my account, but this is the same issue. So right now, we can't install it as a service. Maybe this is an issue with the security on the folders and files. Right now i don't have the time to test it, maybe tomorrow evening. Jim PROFIT We are already in touch with the BOINC group and Nvidia on the issue. For now run it as you can... The slow display will be sorted in one of the next application version, but it is a direct consequence of the fact that our workunits are really things that you would run on a supercomputer, so they are heavier. gdf PS: I still don´t understand the deviceQuery issue... The only thing I don't get is why the application fully needs one of my CPU cores on the following hardware: Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GT I hope this can be tweaked in the future, I also hope that when BOINC is better in supporting GPUs, more projects will start utilizing CUDA.
	ID: 1875 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1876 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 21:12:12 UTC - in response to Message 1875.
	I guess the whole problem has to with BOINC running as a service. I might also be related to the secure option. At least we are able to run applications when we don't use the secure service mode. I try to install it as a service and change to "Local System" and my account, but this is the same issue. So right now, we can't install it as a service. Maybe this is an issue with the security on the folders and files. Right now i don't have the time to test it, maybe tomorrow evening. Jim PROFIT We are already in touch with the BOINC group and Nvidia on the issue. For now run it as you can... The slow display will be sorted in one of the next application version, but it is a direct consequence of the fact that our workunits are really things that you would run on a supercomputer, so they are heavier. gdf PS: I still don´t understand the deviceQuery issue... The only thing I don't get is why the application fully needs one of my CPU cores on the following hardware: Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GT I hope this can be tweaked in the future, I also hope that when BOINC is better in supporting GPUs, more projects will start utilizing CUDA. BOINC is quite good at supporting GPUs already, I think. All can be improved of course, for instance on Vista where we started to test just few days ago. By the way thanks for finding the problem, that was very useful. The CPU load is practically zero even it looks like is doing something. If you were running two other jobs, you would not notice much difference. It is only synchronizing calls to the GPU. gdf
	ID: 1876 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1877 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 22:26:20 UTC - in response to Message 1876.
	I guess the whole problem has to with BOINC running as a service. I might also be related to the secure option. At least we are able to run applications when we don't use the secure service mode. I try to install it as a service and change to "Local System" and my account, but this is the same issue. So right now, we can't install it as a service. Maybe this is an issue with the security on the folders and files. Right now i don't have the time to test it, maybe tomorrow evening. Jim PROFIT We are already in touch with the BOINC group and Nvidia on the issue. For now run it as you can... The slow display will be sorted in one of the next application version, but it is a direct consequence of the fact that our workunits are really things that you would run on a supercomputer, so they are heavier. gdf PS: I still don´t understand the deviceQuery issue... The only thing I don't get is why the application fully needs one of my CPU cores on the following hardware: Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz Coprocessor: GeForce 8600 GT I hope this can be tweaked in the future, I also hope that when BOINC is better in supporting GPUs, more projects will start utilizing CUDA. BOINC is quite good at supporting GPUs already, I think. All can be improved of course, for instance on Vista where we started to test just few days ago. By the way thanks for finding the problem, that was very useful. The CPU load is practically zero even it looks like is doing something. If you were running two other jobs, you would not notice much difference. It is only synchronizing calls to the GPU. gdf How come Folding@Home hasn't got this issue? Next to this my machine gets very unresponsive from the application, which also suggest some issues with this. This also doesn't happen with folding@home. Glad I could help sorting this out. Is the source code from the application available somewhere, so I might be able to look into that to, in order to look if some stuff can be optimized in respect to CPU usage/syncing.
	ID: 1877 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1878 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 23:00:50 UTC
	sry i read the whole thread but i think i missed the point what to do to make it run... do i only have to completely reinstall it?
	ID: 1878 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1879 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 23:04:20 UTC - in response to Message 1878.
	sry i read the whole thread but i think i missed the point what to do to make it run... do i only have to completely reinstall it? Just start boinc.exe manually from it's folder and not as service works
	ID: 1879 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Robinski Send message Joined: 2 Jun 08 Posts: 25 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1880 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 23:04:48 UTC - in response to Message 1878.
	sry i read the whole thread but i think i missed the point what to do to make it run... do i only have to completely reinstall it? Just start boinc.exe manually from it's folder and not as service works. It seems to be a Vista Service Privilege thing which I hope can be sorted out.
	ID: 1880 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1881 - Posted: 28 Aug 2008 \| 23:22:12 UTC
	strange but works^^
	ID: 1881 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1882 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 3:11:03 UTC
	Very strange but it does not work for me. I reinstalled BOINC and this time not as a service. BOINC now showed the GTX 260 at startup and I got 3 WUs ( 48573, 48499, 48498 ), but they all failed immediately with a nice windows-error-popup... Problemsignatur: Problemereignisname: APPCRASH Anwendungsname: acemd_6.43_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe Anwendungsversion: 0.0.0.0 Anwendungszeitstempel: 48b5df12 Fehlermodulname: StackHash_8ba6 Fehlermodulversion: 0.0.0.0 Fehlermodulzeitstempel: 00000000 Ausnahmecode: c0000005 Ausnahmeoffset: 00000000 Betriebsystemversion: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.1 Gebietsschema-ID: 3079 Zusatzinformation 1: 8ba6 Zusatzinformation 2: b351d78a8829f7a4b1ffdab18bef7051 Zusatzinformation 3: 5888 Zusatzinformation 4: 7cdf0ced603a54a430d2129923501d3f This was what I could see in the BOINC messages- 29.08.2008 04:59:14\|PS3GRID\|Starting Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 29.08.2008 04:59:14\|PS3GRID\|Starting task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 using acemd version 643 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Computation for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 finished 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_0 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_1 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_2 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_3 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent And this the stderr.out - <core_client_version>6.3.10</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005) </message> ]]> ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1882 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1883 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 3:54:44 UTC - in response to Message 1882.
	Is anyone else running on a GTX200 series card? gdf
	ID: 1883 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>HFR>RR] Jim PROFIT Send message Joined: 3 Jun 07 Posts: 107 Credit: 31,331,137 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1885 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 7:28:47 UTC - in response to Message 1883. Last modified: 29 Aug 2008 \| 7:30:06 UTC
	Is anyone else running on a GTX200 series card? gdf I'm running the project on GTX200, and as i have said, all works fine! But with 2 cards, i can only use only for the project in both Vista 32 and 64. Reset the project should correct the problem. Jim PROFIT
	ID: 1885 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1893 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 10:13:19 UTC - in response to Message 1885. Last modified: 29 Aug 2008 \| 10:19:36 UTC
	Is anyone else running on a GTX200 series card? gdf I'm running the project on GTX200, and as i have said, all works fine! But with 2 cards, i can only use only for the project in both Vista 32 and 64. Reset the project should correct the problem. Jim PROFIT So, you have two cards on the same machine? You should be able to use both at the same time. Which hostid are you referring to? I don't see any machine on Vista 64 crunching with your id!?? You have one with XP 64. gdf
	ID: 1893 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1895 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 10:23:12 UTC
	This one I think http://www.ps3grid.net/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6946
	ID: 1895 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 1902 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 12:08:40 UTC - in response to Message 1895.
	This one I think http://www.ps3grid.net/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6946 Well if it is this host, I wouldn't say all is running fine... ;) So far all WUs errored out with <core_client_version>6.3.10</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> <stderr_txt> Cuda error in file 'deviceQuery.cu' in line 59 : initialization error. Assertion failed: 0, file deviceQuery.cu, line 59 This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. </stderr_txt> ]]> Which is the same error like I got it when BOINC was installed as a sevice... But let's see what happens with the WUs that are in progress on this host. ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 1902 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>HFR>RR] Jim PROFIT Send message Joined: 3 Jun 07 Posts: 107 Credit: 31,331,137 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1912 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 15:59:10 UTC - in response to Message 1902.
	This one I think http://www.ps3grid.net/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6946 Well if it is this host, I wouldn't say all is running fine... ;) So far all WUs errored out with <core_client_version>6.3.10</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> <stderr_txt> Cuda error in file 'deviceQuery.cu' in line 59 : initialization error. Assertion failed: 0, file deviceQuery.cu, line 59 This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. </stderr_txt> ]]> Which is the same error like I got it when BOINC was installed as a sevice... But let's see what happens with the WUs that are in progress on this host. Sorry, i made a mistake! For this machine, i forget to reset the project when i try on Vista x64. And this host have only a 8700M GT! So don't expect to have an incredible time. I just try to run Boinc in Vista x64, and if i don't use the Secure Mode, Boinc show me my card. But only one card. And i have one GTX 280 and one GTX 260 int this host When i will be at home, i will try with my GTX 280 to see if all works fine. These 5 hosts 7023, 7403, 7399, 6947, and 6639 are the same host but with different OS. Jim PROFIT
	ID: 1912 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Oliver Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 1923 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008 \| 19:44:52 UTC
	does anyone know when a working version will come out? it works, without the service, but it doesnt connect to the internet to get new tasks.
	ID: 1923 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 2006 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 \| 0:29:33 UTC Last modified: 2 Sep 2008 \| 0:31:44 UTC
	A question to the users with Vista64 and who are running gpugrid - Does the acemd 6.43 application and BOINC 6.3.10 work for you if you don't install BOINC as a service? I still have problems with Vista Ultimate 64 bit, BOINC 6.3.10 x86_64 and the 6.43 acemd application on my GTX 260. The app crashes after one second with a Windows error message saying that the application isn't working anymore... Now I really would be interested why the application is crashing on my computer, but not on others with Vista 64? Someone else here with the same problem? I already tried the 177.84 and 177.92 beta drivers, but with both I dave the same error. Which drivers are you using on Vista 64? Do you use the 32- or the 64 bit BOINC Client? Anything special that have to be done, other than not to install BOINC as a service? Thanks, Stefan ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 2006 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[SETI.USA]Tank_Master Send message Joined: 8 Jul 07 Posts: 85 Credit: 67,463,387 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2008 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 \| 6:05:18 UTC Last modified: 2 Sep 2008 \| 6:12:17 UTC
	service install is the ONLY option now with the 6.x.x series for windows. I am running server 2008 x64 with the latest drivers (177.84) and while I haven't yet completed a work unit, I have not had any errors after running for 5 hrs on my 8800 GTS 512. I have the 64bit BOINC 6.3.10 installed. I installed both the app directory and data directory to their own directories on a non OS partition, and selected to give any user access to control BOINC. would it be possible to put a link for the 64bit BOINC client on the home page with the 32bit win client? The 64bit clients will auto grab 32bit work when 64bit apps are not available from almost any projetc.
	ID: 2008 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 2009 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 \| 7:05:10 UTC - in response to Message 2008.
	service install is the ONLY option now with the 6.x.x series for windows. ... I'm sorry, but that's not right. If you click the "Advanced" button on the configuration screen of the installer, and you don't select the "Protected application execution" BOINC is installed the old way. You still would have the BOINC directories split to Program Files and ProgramData, but BOINC would not run as a service... ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 2009 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Wolfram1 Send message Joined: 24 Aug 08 Posts: 45 Credit: 3,431,862 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2010 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 \| 7:29:13 UTC - in response to Message 2009. Last modified: 2 Sep 2008 \| 7:31:16 UTC
	service install is the ONLY option now with the 6.x.x series for windows. ... I'm sorry, but that's not right. If you click the "Advanced" button on the configuration screen of the installer, and you don't select the "Protected application execution" BOINC is installed the old way. You still would have the BOINC directories split to Program Files and ProgramData, but BOINC would not run as a service... Here my configuration: Vista 64 bit, Nbvdia 177.92 with 64 bit, Boinc 6.3.10 with 64 bit and I clicked "Advanced" and do not click "Protected application execution". And it runs fine, I am happy. Before I made a Boinc-installaton without "advanced" und run the Boinc.exe with administration rights and it crashes at the start.
	ID: 2010 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2012 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 \| 9:31:58 UTC - in response to Message 2008.
	service install is the ONLY option now with the 6.x.x series for windows. I am running server 2008 x64 with the latest drivers (177.84) and while I haven't yet completed a work unit, I have not had any errors after running for 5 hrs on my 8800 GTS 512. I have the 64bit BOINC 6.3.10 installed. I installed both the app directory and data directory to their own directories on a non OS partition, and selected to give any user access to control BOINC. would it be possible to put a link for the 64bit BOINC client on the home page with the 32bit win client? The 64bit clients will auto grab 32bit work when 64bit apps are not available from almost any projetc. I am still not understanding if it works on Vista 64 or not? Does it work on Vista 32 too? Shall I simply put on the home page to install using the advanced features and do not click "Protected application execution". ???? gdf
	ID: 2012 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 2015 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 \| 12:25:56 UTC Last modified: 2 Sep 2008 \| 12:29:53 UTC
	Hi G, as far as I understand it from the other posts - If BOINC is installed as a service (protected application mode), it does not detect the coprocessor for most people on Vista64, and BOINC shows the device emulation. That way it does not work. If BOINC is not installed as a service, it does detect the Coprocessor and it seems to work for the other users. Unfortunately It doesn't work for me with both installation options. If I don't install BOINC as a service, it is able to detect the Coprocessor and shows the GTX 260, but all tasks error out on my computer. Still in the same way like I described it in the email I sent to you and Rom on the 29th August... So far I have seen the following - 1) If BOINC 6.3.10 is installed in protected mode (as a service) it does not detect my GTX 260 graphics card. It only shows CUDA devices found Coprocessor: device emulation (CPU)(1) I still can get work from GPUGRID, but all WUs error out with <core_client_version>6.3.10</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Das System kann den angegebenen Pfad nicht finden. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> <stderr_txt> Cuda error in file 'deviceQuery.cu' in line 59 : initialization error. Assertion failed: 0, file deviceQuery.cu, line 59 This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. </stderr_txt> ]]> (Das System kann den angegeben Pfad nicht finden should mean something like "the system can't find the specified path") 2) If BOINC is not installed as a service and I start it with the BOINC manager, it does detect the card and shows CUDA devices found Coprocessor GeForce GTX 260 (1) I can get work from GPUGRID, but all WUs error out immediately after one second with a Windows error message popup saying- Problemsignatur: Problemereignisname: APPCRASH Anwendungsname: acemd_6.43_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe Anwendungsversion: 0.0.0.0 Anwendungszeitstempel: 48b5df12 Fehlermodulname: StackHash_8ba6 Fehlermodulversion: 0.0.0.0 Fehlermodulzeitstempel: 00000000 Ausnahmecode: c0000005 Ausnahmeoffset: 00000000 Betriebsystemversion: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.1 Gebietsschema-ID: 3079 Zusatzinformation 1: 8ba6 Zusatzinformation 2: b351d78a8829f7a4b1ffdab18bef7051 Zusatzinformation 3: 5888 Zusatzinformation 4: 7cdf0ced603a54a430d2129923501d3f BOINC manager shows this in the messages - 29.08.2008 04:59:14\|PS3GRID\|Starting Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 29.08.2008 04:59:14\|PS3GRID\|Starting task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 using acemd version 643 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Computation for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 finished 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_0 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_1 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_2 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent 29.08.2008 04:59:15\|PS3GRID\|Output file Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0_3 for task Kof6107-GPUTEST2-5-10-acemd_0 absent And that's in the stderr.out <core_client_version>6.3.10</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005) </message> ]]> 3) If I run boinc.exe manually, and then start the BOINC manager, it is the same as in case 2). (Actually I don't understand why it would make a difference if I start boinc.exe manually, or boinc.exe is started from the BOINC manager? Don't know why other people say it works for them that way...) 4) Even if I try to run boinc.exe as an administrator (right click boinc.exe/run as administrator) I get the same as in case 2 and 3. ---- All the tests have been made on the same computer - Core2Quad Q9300, 2GB DDR2 1066, EVGA GeForce GTX260, Windows Vista Ultimate 64 bit, BOINC 6.3.10 x86_64, Nvidia drivers from 177.35 to 177.92 beta and Folding@home is running fine since a few weeks wihout a single error on this GPU... If I should try something else please let me know. Or if it would help you, I would also give you remote access to this computer. Stefan ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 2015 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2031 - Posted: 2 Sep 2008 \| 18:20:01 UTC
	Stefan, did you already reset the project? This "Output file ... absent" is typical for not resetting after the upgrade to 6.41 / 6.43, MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 2031 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 135,911,881 RAC: 68 Level Scientific publications	Message 2048 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 2:16:40 UTC - in response to Message 2031.
	Stefan, did you already reset the project? This "Output file ... absent" is typical for not resetting after the upgrade to 6.41 / 6.43, MrS MrS - Thank you! You're da man! ;-) It's eventually working now! I completely forgot about the resetting because I actually never computed a WU on this host... Let's see how the GTX 260 on Vista64 performs compared to my 9800 GTX SC and the 8800 GT on Linux 64. :) ____________ pixelicious.at - my little photoblog
	ID: 2048 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2053 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 7:45:38 UTC
	Great news! So now we have it officially: GPU-GRid works under Vista 32/64, but you mustn't install as a service. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 2053 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2056 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 8:17:52 UTC - in response to Message 2053. Last modified: 3 Sep 2008 \| 8:18:04 UTC
	Great news! So now we have it officially: GPU-GRid works under Vista 32/64, but you mustn't install as a service. MrS I have added Windows 64 as platform on the from page. GDF
	ID: 2056 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Kokomiko Send message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2064 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 14:00:51 UTC Last modified: 3 Sep 2008 \| 14:03:33 UTC
	Of course it works, I work since the 27th of August with my 8800GT under Vista Ultimate 64bit and since 29th of August with my GTX280 under Vista Ultimate 64bit. But the BOINC.EXE 6.3.10 is a memory pig, needs up to 1 GB RAM after some running time. It's no problem for me, I have 8 GB RAM, but better is to restart every day. Maybe the next version runs without a daily babysitter. ____________
	ID: 2064 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2068 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 17:07:38 UTC - in response to Message 2064.
	Of course it works, I work since the 27th of August with my 8800GT under Vista Ultimate 64bit and since 29th of August with my GTX280 under Vista Ultimate 64bit. But the BOINC.EXE 6.3.10 is a memory pig, needs up to 1 GB RAM after some running time. It's no problem for me, I have 8 GB RAM, but better is to restart every day. Maybe the next version runs without a daily babysitter. I have mentioned this problem to BOINC dev. gdf
	ID: 2068 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2069 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 17:08:57 UTC
	That's what would be called a memory leak rather than a memory pig. I had my 6.3.10 running for about a week on XP 32 and just restarted it to check, but it consumed exactly the same amount of RAM as before (read from taskmanager), so no problem here. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
	ID: 2069 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

[SETI.USA]Tank_Master Send message Joined: 8 Jul 07 Posts: 85 Credit: 67,463,387 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2071 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 19:40:57 UTC - in response to Message 2069.
	That's what would be called a memory leak rather than a memory pig. I had my 6.3.10 running for about a week on XP 32 and just restarted it to check, but it consumed exactly the same amount of RAM as before (read from taskmanager), so no problem here. MrS BOINCMgr.exe is taking 117MB on my comp after a day n a half of being installed. BOINC 64bit 6.3.10, server 2008 x64, 4GB RAM. Running 4 projects, with several hundred tasks in total queued to run.
	ID: 2071 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Kokomiko Send message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 2075 - Posted: 3 Sep 2008 \| 22:14:22 UTC
	On Vista Ultimate 64 bit after a running time of 10.5 hours they use actually 372,340 K, on my XP Pro 64 bit only 25.864 K. On my second Vista Ultimate 64 bit 441.564 K after a runtime of 15.75 hours. Looks not like a one-time error. ____________
	ID: 2075 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : error on vistax64

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate