Advanced search

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta application using cuda4.0 out for windows

Author Message
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25333 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 17:25:23 UTC
Last modified: 29 May 2012 | 17:57:59 UTC

This is for testing the new application on older cuda.

We will keep only cuda4.0 and cuda4.2 applications. The second one is required only if you have a kepler card and it needs newest drivers. So, most people will be actually using cuda4.0 which is being tested now in beta.

If you have a cuda4.2 driver, the server should give you that. If you have a older driver but more recent than 270.41, then you should receive cuda4.0.

Another change is that as most of valuable work in the long queue, we will be testing the new application on the acemd2 queue as soon as the beta ends. Only later extend it to acemdlong.

Is it a problem to have only cuda4.2 for Linux?

gdf

gdf

HA-SOFT, s.r.o.
Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 11
Posts: 100
Credit: 5,879,292,399
RAC: 0
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25334 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 17:53:01 UTC - in response to Message 25333.

Is it a problem to have only cuda4.2 for Linux?


No problem for us.

Profile Carlesa25
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 13 Nov 10
Posts: 328
Credit: 72,619,453
RAC: 206
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25336 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 18:24:48 UTC - in response to Message 25334.
Last modified: 29 May 2012 | 18:25:15 UTC

Hi, The latest drivers NVIDIA for Linux (Ubuntu) already support CUDA 4.2. Greetings.

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,308,230,581
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25337 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 19:57:38 UTC
Last modified: 29 May 2012 | 19:59:15 UTC

GTX560Ti CC2.1 XP 64bit driver 301.24, core 6.10.58: 3 tasks errored out at beginning
GT555M W7 64bit driver 301.42, core 7.0.25: 1 task errored out after 60s
Both machines changed profile (no beta more).

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 224
Credit: 34,057,224,498
RAC: 190
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25338 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 19:59:17 UTC
Last modified: 29 May 2012 | 20:25:29 UTC

This windows beta is giving major screen lag in XP 64. Driver 301.42, 7.0.25, GTX580. Have suspended while I still can. One completed OK & one failed after 20secs.
Update: Tried Boinc 7.0.28 but still the same lag, making computer unusable. Tasks finished OK though.

Bedrich Hajek
Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 467
Credit: 8,192,696,966
RAC: 10,573,360
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25340 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 21:42:08 UTC - in response to Message 25333.
Last modified: 29 May 2012 | 21:46:43 UTC

This is for testing the new application on older cuda.

We will keep only cuda4.0 and cuda4.2 applications. The second one is required only if you have a kepler card and it needs newest drivers. So, most people will be actually using cuda4.0 which is being tested now in beta.

If you have a cuda4.2 driver, the server should give you that. If you have a older driver but more recent than 270.41, then you should receive cuda4.0.

Another change is that as most of valuable work in the long queue, we will be testing the new application on the acemd2 queue as soon as the beta ends. Only later extend it to acemdlong.

Is it a problem to have only cuda4.2 for Linux?

gdf

gdf



The priority needs to be set to below normal, because these units make the computer slow and sluggish.

The cuda 4.0 units are about 50+ seconds slower than the cuba 4.2 units on my computers, so why bother with cuba 4.0 all together, and have everyone update their drivers?

5pot
Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 12
Posts: 411
Credit: 2,083,882,218
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25341 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 22:06:45 UTC

On my 680 I'm receiving both CUDA 4 and 4.2. Mainly 4.2, and as expected the 4.0 error out at 0.00

Driver 302.59

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25342 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 22:13:16 UTC

Assuming the cuda40 and 42 beta work units are the same size the cuda42 seems to be the fastest on cpu and run-time on my GTX570. Link to one host here

I would suggest cuda42 be the default for Fermi and Kepler based cards (and appropiate driver version), otherwise cuda40 as the fallback.

Also machine response is very bad when running these, presumable because of their priority as other have mentioned.
____________
BOINC blog

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25343 - Posted: 29 May 2012 | 22:44:05 UTC - in response to Message 25342.

A fix coming up tomorrow. Now you should be getting always the same application.
Either 4.2 or 4.0 depending on the driver. Not a mixture of the two...

gdf

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25347 - Posted: 30 May 2012 | 8:31:46 UTC - in response to Message 25340.

The cuda 4.0 units are about 50+ seconds slower than the cuba 4.2 units on my computers, so why bother with cuba 4.0 all together, and have everyone update their drivers?

The project is trying to be nice to crunchers. For some updating the driver is a nightmare or not [easily] possible due to various reasons.

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25348 - Posted: 30 May 2012 | 9:14:03 UTC
Last modified: 30 May 2012 | 9:16:16 UTC

From discussions with the Seti optimisers (well one of them anyway), he said that the older GTX2xx cards are worse off running cuda42 apps. It would seem cuda42 is particularly optimised for Fermi and Kepler chips. The old cards can still run them, they are slower than a cuda32 app on the same card. I don't think they ever tried a cuda40 app, but they did try cuda41 which also was worse than cuda32 on older cards.

You might need to consider a cuda32 app for the older cards, even if the user has up to date drivers. That is a cuda32 instead of a cuda40 app. You could use the compute capability to determine if they should get cuda32 app rather than driver version. Something like (if compute capability = 1.3 then use cuda32)
____________
BOINC blog

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,308,230,581
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25365 - Posted: 30 May 2012 | 17:50:05 UTC - in response to Message 25337.

"nenym" wrote:
GTX560Ti CC2.1 XP 64bit driver 301.24, core 6.10.58: 3 tasks errored out at beginning
The same one beta CUDA 42 task with 301.42 driver.

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25366 - Posted: 30 May 2012 | 18:07:15 UTC - in response to Message 25348.

The new app does not compile on anything older than cuda4.0.

gdf

From discussions with the Seti optimisers (well one of them anyway), he said that the older GTX2xx cards are worse off running cuda42 apps. It would seem cuda42 is particularly optimised for Fermi and Kepler chips. The old cards can still run them, they are slower than a cuda32 app on the same card. I don't think they ever tried a cuda40 app, but they did try cuda41 which also was worse than cuda32 on older cards.

You might need to consider a cuda32 app for the older cards, even if the user has up to date drivers. That is a cuda32 instead of a cuda40 app. You could use the compute capability to determine if they should get cuda32 app rather than driver version. Something like (if compute capability = 1.3 then use cuda32)

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25376 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 10:56:11 UTC - in response to Message 25366.

The new app does not compile on anything older than cuda4.0.

gdf

From discussions with the Seti optimisers (well one of them anyway), he said that the older GTX2xx cards are worse off running cuda42 apps. It would seem cuda42 is particularly optimised for Fermi and Kepler chips. The old cards can still run them, they are slower than a cuda32 app on the same card. I don't think they ever tried a cuda40 app, but they did try cuda41 which also was worse than cuda32 on older cards.

You might need to consider a cuda32 app for the older cards, even if the user has up to date drivers. That is a cuda32 instead of a cuda40 app. You could use the compute capability to determine if they should get cuda32 app rather than driver version. Something like (if compute capability = 1.3 then use cuda32)


If cuda40 is the minimum version you can do, can you supply it based on the compute capability of the card?
____________
BOINC blog

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25380 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 17:51:14 UTC - in response to Message 25376.

New cuda4.0 app is out now for windows only.

Let us know.

gdf

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 224
Credit: 34,057,224,498
RAC: 190
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25384 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 18:54:06 UTC
Last modified: 31 May 2012 | 19:36:20 UTC

The first task (cuda40) took 2 minutes & all was fine. The other tasks (cuda42) are causing the screen to become unresponsive. Tasks finishing without error. XP64,GTX580, 7.0.28, 301.42.
Getting more cuda40 now. Guess these are all configured differently? This one took 16m30s

5pot
Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 12
Posts: 411
Credit: 2,083,882,218
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25388 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 19:41:22 UTC
Last modified: 31 May 2012 | 19:42:05 UTC

Welcome to the 2D clock bug

GPU is at 50MHz

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 224
Credit: 34,057,224,498
RAC: 190
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25390 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 19:47:40 UTC

Yeah. Just rebooted & back to normal.

5pot
Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 12
Posts: 411
Credit: 2,083,882,218
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25391 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 19:50:41 UTC

Is yours a factory overclocked card?

With these newer drivers, there are quite a few people on NVIDIA's forums with factory OC, which are getting these types of issues.

Will have to see if this keeps popping up I guess with everyone else.

Cheers

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 224
Credit: 34,057,224,498
RAC: 190
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25392 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 19:54:46 UTC
Last modified: 31 May 2012 | 19:57:18 UTC

I flashed the bios myself a year ago & never had any issues with it. I think the driver just crashed rather than down clocked. That slow cuda40 task was straight after a cuda42 one which was causing lag.

5pot
Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 12
Posts: 411
Credit: 2,083,882,218
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25393 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 19:58:01 UTC
Last modified: 31 May 2012 | 19:58:58 UTC

GDF:

Still getting a mix of the 4.0 and 4.2 on my 680.

301.42

And yes, I'm getting some pretty big lag too. With CPU tasks, utilization on W7 is about 91%. Without, 87%

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25395 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 20:21:05 UTC - in response to Message 25393.

I removed the cuda4.2 application. There should only be a 4.0 one with no lag problems.

gdf

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 224
Credit: 34,057,224,498
RAC: 190
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25396 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 21:27:54 UTC

cuda40 tasks seem to be all ok with no lag. However, should they be using 100% cpu thread with no swan_sync?

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25397 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 21:30:00 UTC - in response to Message 25396.

no. it should not.
A fix tomorrow.

gdf

Bedrich Hajek
Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 467
Credit: 8,192,696,966
RAC: 10,573,360
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25399 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 21:49:19 UTC - in response to Message 25395.

I removed the cuda4.2 application. There should only be a 4.0 one with no lag problems.

gdf


I am still getting the cuda4.2, with the priority set at high, which causing the computer to be sluggish. The cuda4.0 have a below normal priority, with no sluggishness.

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25401 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 22:10:01 UTC - in response to Message 25399.

can you reset the project and try again?

It's very strange.

gdf

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25402 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 22:23:15 UTC - in response to Message 25395.

Is it a problem to have only cuda4.2 for Linux?

The Ubuntu 12.04 repository version of the NVidia driver is 295.40. This is CUDA 4.2 capable. The more recent 295.53 Certified version can also be downloaded from NVidia.
It might be worth noting however that for people with non-fermi/kepler cards (probably not very many) a CUDA 4.2 app would perform less efficiently, and for those with older drivers and Fermi or Kepler cards they would not be able to contribute without updating drivers.

Is a project reset now required for the new/chosen app to propagate, rather than a standard project update?

On swan_sync. Changes to this require a restart to take effect (just in case you didn't). Sounds like 'real-time' priority though.

BTW, is there anyone crunching for GPUGrid that still uses Win98? http://www.gpugrid.net/apps.php

Platform - Version - Installation time
Microsoft Windows (98 or later) - running on an Intel x86-compatible CPU - 31 May 2012 | 17:48:34 UTC

____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Bedrich Hajek
Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 467
Credit: 8,192,696,966
RAC: 10,573,360
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25403 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 22:27:45 UTC - in response to Message 25401.

can you reset the project and try again?

It's very strange.

gdf


How would that work, my machine just asking for work? Your server is sending it out.

Bedrich Hajek
Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 467
Credit: 8,192,696,966
RAC: 10,573,360
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25407 - Posted: 31 May 2012 | 23:49:55 UTC - in response to Message 25401.

can you reset the project and try again?

It's very strange.

gdf


OK, I reset the project on one of my machines, after that it downloaded 2 cuda4.2 units. The priority is still set high.

5/31/2012 7:42:15 PM | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed
5/31/2012 7:42:45 PM | GPUGRID | Resetting project
5/31/2012 7:42:52 PM | GPUGRID | work fetch resumed by user
5/31/2012 7:42:55 PM | GPUGRID | update requested by user
5/31/2012 7:43:00 PM | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
5/31/2012 7:43:00 PM | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA
5/31/2012 7:43:05 PM | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks
5/31/2012 7:43:07 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of acemd.2517.win
5/31/2012 7:43:07 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of cudart32_42_9.dll
5/31/2012 7:43:20 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of cudart32_42_9.dll
5/31/2012 7:43:20 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of cufft32_42_9.dll
5/31/2012 7:43:34 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of acemd.2517.win
5/31/2012 7:43:34 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of tcl85.dll
5/31/2012 7:43:40 PM | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
5/31/2012 7:43:40 PM | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA
5/31/2012 7:43:42 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of tcl85.dll
5/31/2012 7:43:42 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-LICENSE
5/31/2012 7:43:43 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-LICENSE
5/31/2012 7:43:43 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-COPYRIGHT
5/31/2012 7:43:43 PM | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
5/31/2012 7:43:43 PM | GPUGRID | No tasks sent
5/31/2012 7:43:43 PM | GPUGRID | This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress
5/31/2012 7:43:45 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-COPYRIGHT
5/31/2012 7:43:45 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-coor_file
5/31/2012 7:43:54 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-coor_file
5/31/2012 7:43:54 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-vel_file
5/31/2012 7:44:03 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-vel_file
5/31/2012 7:44:03 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-idx_file
5/31/2012 7:44:04 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-idx_file
5/31/2012 7:44:04 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-pdb_file
5/31/2012 7:44:25 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-pdb_file
5/31/2012 7:44:25 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-psf_file
5/31/2012 7:44:54 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-psf_file
5/31/2012 7:44:54 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-par_file
5/31/2012 7:44:59 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-par_file
5/31/2012 7:44:59 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-conf_file_enc
5/31/2012 7:45:00 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-conf_file_enc
5/31/2012 7:45:00 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-metainp_file
5/31/2012 7:45:01 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-metainp_file
5/31/2012 7:45:01 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-hills_file
5/31/2012 7:45:02 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-hills_file
5/31/2012 7:45:02 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-LICENSE
5/31/2012 7:45:03 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-LICENSE
5/31/2012 7:45:03 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-COPYRIGHT
5/31/2012 7:45:04 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-COPYRIGHT
5/31/2012 7:45:04 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_1
5/31/2012 7:45:09 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_1
5/31/2012 7:45:09 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_2
5/31/2012 7:45:18 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_2
5/31/2012 7:45:18 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_3
5/31/2012 7:45:21 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_3
5/31/2012 7:45:21 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-pdb_file
5/31/2012 7:45:38 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-pdb_file
5/31/2012 7:45:38 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-psf_file
5/31/2012 7:46:14 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-psf_file
5/31/2012 7:46:14 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-par_file
5/31/2012 7:46:17 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-par_file
5/31/2012 7:46:17 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-conf_file_enc
5/31/2012 7:46:18 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-conf_file_enc
5/31/2012 7:46:18 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-metainp_file
5/31/2012 7:46:19 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-metainp_file
5/31/2012 7:46:19 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_7
5/31/2012 7:46:20 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 311-GIANNI_TEST6-1-311-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7130_7
5/31/2012 7:46:20 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of logogpugrid.png
5/31/2012 7:46:21 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of logogpugrid.png
5/31/2012 7:46:21 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of project_1.png
5/31/2012 7:46:22 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of project_1.png
5/31/2012 7:46:22 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of project_2.png
5/31/2012 7:46:23 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of project_2.png
5/31/2012 7:46:23 PM | GPUGRID | Started download of project_3.png
5/31/2012 7:46:24 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of project_3.png
5/31/2012 7:46:48 PM | GPUGRID | Finished download of cufft32_42_9.dll
5/31/2012 7:46:49 PM | GPUGRID | Starting task 291-GIANNI_TEST6-0-5-RND7418_2 using acemdbeta version 643 (cuda42) in slot 1

Snow Crash
Send message
Joined: 4 Apr 09
Posts: 450
Credit: 539,316,349
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25413 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 7:44:00 UTC
Last modified: 1 Jun 2012 | 7:48:57 UTC

-------------------------------------------------
HAL9008
-------------------------------------------------
Intel i7-920
WinXP 32 SP3
GTX 295 w/ 301.42 driver
GTX 480 w/ 301.42 driver

Yes, I have both cards in the same machine
Was getting both 4.0 and 4.2 versions
Reset project (no reboot)
Received both 4.0 and 4.2 versions

both versions on both cards ran successfully
4.2 version much faster on BOTH cards

-------------------------------------------------
HAL9005
-------------------------------------------------
Intel i7-920
Win7 64
GTX 670 w/ 301.42 driver
Was getting both 4.0 and 4.2 versions
Reset the project and received 4.0 version :-(

4.0 crashed, 4.2 ran successfully
____________
Thanks - Steve

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,308,230,581
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25415 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 9:08:04 UTC

GTX560Ti CC2.1, XP64bit, driver 301.42, Swan_Sync NOT set.
GPUGRID reattached, machine restarted, both 6.43 (CUDA4.2) and 6.44 (CUDA4.0) errored out after 5 - 10s.
http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=31329
Any idea?

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 224
Credit: 34,057,224,498
RAC: 190
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25416 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 9:23:16 UTC
Last modified: 1 Jun 2012 | 9:26:00 UTC

You need to upgrade Boinc to at least 7.0.25. I'm using beta 7.0.28 & it's OK for me.
NOTE: Make sure all tasks are finished & reported before upgrading!

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,308,230,581
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25417 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 9:38:14 UTC - in response to Message 25416.

Is upgrading to 7.0.25 of the Boinc core only sufficient? I hate the 7.x manager.

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,308,230,581
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25419 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 11:23:23 UTC - in response to Message 25417.

"Up"grade to 7.0.25 did not help.

TheFiend
Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 11
Posts: 99
Credit: 2,500,112,138
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25420 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 13:11:36 UTC - in response to Message 25417.

Is upgrading to 7.0.25 of the Boinc core only sufficient? I hate the 7.x manager.


I agree.... I much prefer 6.10.60

shdbcamping
Send message
Joined: 2 May 12
Posts: 22
Credit: 145,756,579
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25426 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 17:03:09 UTC

Methinks it's a larger problem than what NV diriver is installed. I'm still hanging in 3.1 waiting for the fix... NV570 X2 (with 7.0.25 client)

Profile dskagcommunity
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 11
Posts: 456
Credit: 817,865,789
RAC: 0
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25428 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 19:34:21 UTC

Does that mean we must upgrade boinc too not only to graphics 301.x driver
____________
DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at



Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25432 - Posted: 1 Jun 2012 | 22:29:46 UTC - in response to Message 25428.

You don't need to upgrade to the latest version of Boinc.
6.10.58 should work fine.
____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

TheFiend
Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 11
Posts: 99
Credit: 2,500,112,138
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25437 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 8:35:51 UTC - in response to Message 25432.

You don't need to upgrade to the latest version of Boinc.
6.10.58 should work fine.


Nice one!!!

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25438 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 9:31:36 UTC - in response to Message 25437.

Another application for cuda4.0 is out only windows.

It should have no sluggish display and very low cpu usage.

gdf

Snow Crash
Send message
Joined: 4 Apr 09
Posts: 450
Credit: 539,316,349
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25440 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 10:36:02 UTC - in response to Message 25438.
Last modified: 2 Jun 2012 | 11:12:26 UTC

FYI - The server is sending these cuda 4.0 WUs to my GTX670 (Win7x64). I'll let it fail and try a reset but it didn't help last time.

I'll try to get some for my GTX295 and GTX480 and see how they run.
(WinXP 32, BOINC 7.0.25, GeForce 301.42)

... Still consuming 1 full CPU.
Ran for 1 minute and failed on the GTX480
Ran for 3 minutes and failed on the GTX295

opting out until new beta ready.
____________
Thanks - Steve

Profile Stoneageman
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 May 09
Posts: 224
Credit: 34,057,224,498
RAC: 190
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25441 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 10:39:50 UTC
Last modified: 2 Jun 2012 | 10:45:50 UTC

Three tasks received. All failed after a few seconds.XP64,GTX580, 7.0.28, 301.42.
ERROR: file deven.cpp line 1106: # Energies have become nan

Profile [PUGLIA] Riccardo
Send message
Joined: 27 Feb 12
Posts: 2
Credit: 3,410,838
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 25444 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 11:57:08 UTC - in response to Message 25441.

Three tasks received. All failed after a few seconds.XP64,GTX580, 7.0.28, 301.42.
ERROR: file deven.cpp line 1106: # Energies have become nan

Hi everybody.
While I was trying to do my usual 2 longrun this weekend, I noticed them failed almost immediately.
And also 6 more failed with various errors :(
There are all (2 still "running" are just because I resetted before they sent, but crashed too) http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?userid=86407 :(

Bye, R!

Bedrich Hajek
Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 467
Credit: 8,192,696,966
RAC: 10,573,360
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25445 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 12:09:31 UTC - in response to Message 25444.

All units are failing after a few seconds:

6/2/2012 8:07:11 AM | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
6/2/2012 8:07:13 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-LICENSE
6/2/2012 8:07:13 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-COPYRIGHT
6/2/2012 8:07:14 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-LICENSE
6/2/2012 8:07:14 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-COPYRIGHT
6/2/2012 8:07:14 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-coor_file
6/2/2012 8:07:14 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-vel_file
6/2/2012 8:07:19 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-coor_file
6/2/2012 8:07:19 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-vel_file
6/2/2012 8:07:19 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-idx_file
6/2/2012 8:07:19 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-pdb_file
6/2/2012 8:07:20 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-idx_file
6/2/2012 8:07:20 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-psf_file
6/2/2012 8:07:32 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-pdb_file
6/2/2012 8:07:32 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-par_file
6/2/2012 8:07:35 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-psf_file
6/2/2012 8:07:35 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-par_file
6/2/2012 8:07:35 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-conf_file_enc
6/2/2012 8:07:35 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-metainp_file
6/2/2012 8:07:36 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-conf_file_enc
6/2/2012 8:07:36 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-metainp_file
6/2/2012 8:07:36 AM | GPUGRID | Started download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-hills_file
6/2/2012 8:07:37 AM | GPUGRID | Finished download of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-hills_file
6/2/2012 8:07:37 AM | GPUGRID | Starting task 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0 using acemdbeta version 645 (cuda40) in slot 1
6/2/2012 8:08:07 AM | GPUGRID | Computation for task 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0 finished
6/2/2012 8:08:07 AM | GPUGRID | Output file 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_1 for task 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0 absent
6/2/2012 8:08:07 AM | GPUGRID | Output file 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_2 for task 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0 absent
6/2/2012 8:08:07 AM | GPUGRID | Output file 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_3 for task 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0 absent
6/2/2012 8:08:21 AM | GPUGRID | work fetch suspended by user
6/2/2012 8:08:22 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_0
6/2/2012 8:08:22 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_4
6/2/2012 8:08:24 AM | GPUGRID | Finished upload of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_0
6/2/2012 8:08:24 AM | GPUGRID | Finished upload of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_4
6/2/2012 8:08:24 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of 76-GIANNI_TEST7-0-5-RND8466_0_7

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25448 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 14:28:19 UTC

Tonight I have been getting a bunch of beta 6.45 cuda40 work units. All failed. Most with "energies have become nan" around 19% through. I have suspended work fetch so others can try and process them.

Card is a GTX570 under Win7 x64 with 301.42 drivers

Link to most recent wu here
Link to first wu here
____________
BOINC blog

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25452 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 17:17:46 UTC - in response to Message 25448.

I'm getting failures too. I think these may be around the checkpoint time?
Failures all occur at ~20% for me.
I changed a lot of settings including frequency (downclocked substantially).

I suggest if anyone has run several betas that have failed that they stop running Beta's for now! If you don't you will stop getting tasks.
____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

GPUGRID Role account
Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 07
Posts: 134
Credit: 1,349,535,983
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25453 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 18:55:09 UTC - in response to Message 25452.

Is it just the Windows cuda40 application that's failing, or the cuda42 one as well?

MJH

Snow Crash
Send message
Joined: 4 Apr 09
Posts: 450
Credit: 539,316,349
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25454 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 19:16:50 UTC - in response to Message 25453.

GTX670, Win7 x64, BOINC 7.0.25 x64, GeForce 301.42

I did not receive any of the cuda 4.2

I reset the project and I still get cuda 4.0 app

Let me know if there is anything else you would like me to try on this machine.



____________
Thanks - Steve

JohnSheridan
Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 09
Posts: 10
Credit: 104,093
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
watwat
Message 25455 - Posted: 2 Jun 2012 | 19:41:47 UTC

Same here - all I am receiving is the Cuda 4.0 work which fails after a few seconds so clearly some problem back server side as it should not be sending us 4.0 work in first place.

Running GTX 680 on Win7 64-bit with nVidia 301.42 drivers.

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25462 - Posted: 3 Jun 2012 | 0:11:10 UTC - in response to Message 25453.
Last modified: 3 Jun 2012 | 8:40:34 UTC

Is it just the Windows cuda40 application that's failing, or the cuda42 one as well?

MJH


I am not getting cuda42. I only seem to be getting cuda40 work. Suspending work fetch again as no point failing all of them.

The last cuda42 I got was a v6.43 (a couple of days ago) and that worked fine.

[edit]
I will add that deselecting Beta tasks in preferences, getting client to update when set to NNT and then asking for work still gives beta work.

Looks like I won't be crunching GPUgrid for a few days until the beta queue gets drained
[/edit]
____________
BOINC blog

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25473 - Posted: 3 Jun 2012 | 12:50:22 UTC - in response to Message 25462.

To stop getting these Beta's you have to say No to the Beta app:
GPUGRID preferences

Run test applications? No

5453268 3473143 125945 2 Jun 2012 | 17:13:15 UTC 2 Jun 2012 | 17:19:41 UTC Error while computing 22.17 2.27 --- ACEMD beta version v6.45 (cuda40)
5452873 3473351 125945 2 Jun 2012 | 14:44:45 UTC 2 Jun 2012 | 17:13:15 UTC Error while computing 55.16 3.27 --- ACEMD beta version v6.45 (cuda40)
5452871 3473349 125945 2 Jun 2012 | 17:13:15 UTC 2 Jun 2012 | 17:19:41 UTC Error while computing 29.33 1.98 --- ACEMD beta version v6.45 (cuda40)
5452826 3473304 125945 2 Jun 2012 | 14:45:55 UTC 2 Jun 2012 | 17:13:15 UTC Error while computing 34.86 3.23 --- ACEMD beta version v6.45 (cuda40)
5451573 3471835 125945 2 Jun 2012 | 2:34:42 UTC 2 Jun 2012 | 14:44:45 UTC Completed and validated 152.66 146.98 150.00 ACEMD beta version v6.44 (cuda40)

Looks like v6.43 and v6.44 were better than v6.45
The 4.2 app tasks all worked on my GTX470.

MJH, Perhaps Gianni removed the CUDA 4.2 app to just test 4.0 apps?
____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25475 - Posted: 3 Jun 2012 | 16:15:01 UTC - in response to Message 25473.

MJH, Perhaps Gianni removed the CUDA 4.2 app to just test 4.0 apps?

Looks like they'll have a busy monday :D

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

lohphat
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 44
Credit: 704,692,359
RAC: 1,198,087
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25477 - Posted: 3 Jun 2012 | 20:50:02 UTC

Yeah the beta apps are failing for me too when the test units last week were doing fine.

GTX 680
301.42 driver
7.0.28 client
win7x64

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25481 - Posted: 4 Jun 2012 | 11:17:04 UTC - in response to Message 25477.
Last modified: 4 Jun 2012 | 11:23:34 UTC

It would be useful to be able to see the app version names in the Server Status page.

You can't even see them in the non indexed apps page,
http://www.gpugrid.net/apps.php

Copied and expanded upon in Comments on new Website
____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Profile nenym
Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 09
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,308,230,581
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25483 - Posted: 4 Jun 2012 | 11:37:41 UTC

GTX560Ti CC2.1, driver 301.42, XP 64bit, core 7.0.25, BM 6.10.58, Swan_Sync NOT set.
Beta 6.45 (CUDA4.0) errored out after 2s.
http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=5460403

comfortw
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 08
Posts: 9
Credit: 1,740,304,089
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25488 - Posted: 4 Jun 2012 | 13:45:34 UTC

Win XP pro 32bit sp3 , BM 7.0.25, Nv driver 301.42

GTX580 and GTX470 have
ACEMD beta version v6.45 (cuda40) computation error (~20sec)

Win 7 64bit sp1, BM7.0.27, Nv driver 301.42
GTX670
has same errors, but run in ACEMD beta version v6.43 (cuda42) OK

____________

comfortw
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 08
Posts: 9
Credit: 1,740,304,089
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25525 - Posted: 6 Jun 2012 | 11:37:38 UTC - in response to Message 25488.

Win XP pro 32bit sp3 , BM 7.0.25, Nv driver 301.42


GTX 470 also failed with another NV driver 285.85 on ACEMD beta v6.45(cuda40)
____________

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta application using cuda4.0 out for windows

//