Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : affordable/reliable 1600 watt psu plz.

Author Message
]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25500 - Posted: 4 Jun 2012 | 22:28:22 UTC

Well I had to get my 2 of my computer back up this month, long story, but I basically am going to have money for the most exspensive part of my computer build next month. I was looking at the thermaltake toughpower tp-1500m from superbiz. But am open to suggestions. I just got tired of looking. Take your time, im really looking for a 1600 watt, as if you google thermaltake psu calculator, which is the one i use, and put in my specs with cpu load and capacitor age it gives around 1600 watts. If you dont account for age it gives 1100 watts, but I personally hate when things break. So around 1600 watts for following build;

8150 amd cpu,
four 570 gtx (just expansion space)
GA-990FXA-UD7 gigabyte motherboard,
and lastly cd-rw and hard drive.

I just like to annoy yall anyways so 1500 watts is close to what i want, 1600 would be nice. I just bought a 850 watt corsair tx this month but corsair doesnt build them that powerful. Thermaltake i was looking at was 310 dollars, but if you got a better brand up your sleeve would love to hear it cause I aint got no experience.

wiyosaya
Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 09
Posts: 114
Credit: 589,114,683
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25515 - Posted: 5 Jun 2012 | 19:57:01 UTC - in response to Message 25500.

You might try an 80+ Platinum certified supply from someone such as Seasonic. The supply you come up with only requires 1100W. If the supply is constructed from reliable components, then I would expect little effects from aging over the life of the supply.

If aging were a big problem in the industry, it would be widely publicized by all the hardware review sites; frankly, I have never heard of it, and I distrust Thermaltake in their attempt to get customers to buy bigger because of aging concerns. Since Thermaltake sells power supplies, it is to their advantage to get you to pay for more capacity than you will ever need. IMHO, Thermaltake sells "bling," and a supply from a more well-known manufacturer like Seasonic (who, incidentally, makes supplies that other manufacturers sell under their brand name), say 1250W, would be more than adequate.
____________

Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2353
Credit: 16,331,142,850
RAC: 4,737,633
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25516 - Posted: 5 Jun 2012 | 20:09:31 UTC - in response to Message 25500.
Last modified: 5 Jun 2012 | 20:17:00 UTC

If you don't like failures, don't put 4 GTX 570s in a single PC.
If you insist to do it, you should cool them with water and a big external radiator to increase the longevity of all components by decreasing the inside temperature.
No wonder that you've got tired of looking for a 1600W PSU, the top size is 1500W by the well known manufacturers.
I would choose an Enermax Platimax 1500W for supplying 4 GTX 570s.

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25522 - Posted: 6 Jun 2012 | 2:38:06 UTC - in response to Message 25516.

So you think four 570s will overheat even with all fans unlocked at 100%, cause that was* my plan. I can either do 8150 with four 570s 16x2 8x2, or I can do xeon 1270 with two 570s x8. First would be mainly gpu grid, second mainly rosetta.

Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2353
Credit: 16,331,142,850
RAC: 4,737,633
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25524 - Posted: 6 Jun 2012 | 8:23:03 UTC - in response to Message 25522.
Last modified: 6 Jun 2012 | 8:23:37 UTC

I didn't say that 4 GTX 570s will overheat with their factory made cooling. In worst case they could. My point is that aging is much faster at higher temperatures, so if you are concerned about aging, you should use extra cooling, because your system needs larger than standard radiators to dissipate 1100 watts at lower temperature. If you put 4 dual slot GPU into a single PC, there is no room left between the GPUs, so you can't install larger heatsinks onto the cards, also they will heat each other, and their air intake will be blocked by each other hence they will run hotter. The only solution is to use water to take the heat from the cards outside the PC at lower temperature to slow down aging.

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25537 - Posted: 7 Jun 2012 | 0:21:16 UTC - in response to Message 25524.

I saw a picture of where yall had put together a 4 card system on here, its nothing to me to replace a graphics card if one goes out. I had a 4870 1gig go out doing folding, and it was basically time for a new one anyways. I did start looking at amd server processors and think I would have no problem installing everything except im getting mixed internet signals on the case form factors such as extended atx having newer versions out as well as SSI EEB 3.61 with newer. I guess I could buy a single processor atx board, but wheres the fun in that. Im just unfamiliar with these form factor cases and power supplys and theyre not cheap so I would like to build a monster gpu grid computer. I think I will be safe with evga because they have a folding@home link on their main webpage, and folding@home makes my asus which is locked at 85% fan speed run from 90 degrees on gpu grid, to 98 degrees on folding which is a degree over spec. Im giving the asus away to my cousin anyways.

Paul Raney
Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 10
Posts: 115
Credit: 416,576,946
RAC: 0
Level
Gln
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25542 - Posted: 7 Jun 2012 | 2:25:49 UTC - in response to Message 25537.

There are some products that allow you to use 2 power supplies in the same computer. This could be a good option for you because (2) 1000W PSUs typically cost less than (1) 1500W PSU. In addition, you can draw power from 2 AC circuits. 1 PSU could be dedicated to the computer and 1 GPU and the other one could push power only to the GPU.

I have never used one of these devices but someone here likely has some experience with them.

I have 1 computer that can take a third GPU but 3 is the max for me. I think I will just buy another computer or get another GTX 590. The 590 has some issues but you get 2 570s in a single slot.

If you want heat, just use 590s or 690s. At 375 Watts, the 590 generates lots of heat!
____________
Thx - Paul

Note: Please don't use driver version 295 or 296! Recommended versions are 266 - 285.

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25544 - Posted: 7 Jun 2012 | 4:01:33 UTC - in response to Message 25542.

You think this case with some unlocked fans would do the trick?

http://www.xclio.com/products/case-windtunnel.htm

Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2353
Credit: 16,331,142,850
RAC: 4,737,633
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25546 - Posted: 7 Jun 2012 | 8:10:52 UTC - in response to Message 25544.
Last modified: 7 Jun 2012 | 8:11:57 UTC

You think this case with some unlocked fans would do the trick?

http://www.xclio.com/products/case-windtunnel.htm

It's looking very good.
Actually I've modded my Chieftec cases to be something similar.
Now they have 2pcs of 12cm fans over the GPUs, and a third one above the RAM modules (over the CPU cooler air intake).

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25549 - Posted: 7 Jun 2012 | 11:42:55 UTC - in response to Message 25546.
Last modified: 7 Jun 2012 | 11:50:23 UTC

Bugler, forget about using the GTX500 series for a new, high end multi-card rig, and forget about a 1500W PSU or two 1000W PSU's for that matter.

Concentrate on using GTX600 series cards, as they are at least 50% more power efficient, in terms of performance per Watt.

Although you would probably pay more for the cards, this would be offset against what you don't need to pay for in a PSU's and the running cost. It's easy to build a high end GPU centric system around a 1000W PSU.

A reference GTX670 has a TDP of 170W, so four of those wouldn't necessitate a 1500W PSU. Although I have not measured actual power usage when running a task here, it's likely to be <75% of the TDP in the GTX600 series (perhaps around 120W each).
Also, three ref. GTX680's have a combined TDP of <600W, and would do more work than 4 GTX570's (combined TDP of 876W). An 850W PSU would suffice on a good setup.
Then there are the GTX690's (combined TDP of 600W) - two of those would keep the running costs well down, and again an 850W PSU should suffice (assuming you don't start overclocking).

Avoid an AMD CPU setup, they don't support PCIE3 or quad channel DDR3. Both would result in a performance hit and the CPU's tend to require more power.

Look for a good 2011 board and a CPU such as a 3820 or 3930K. There are a few posts on this topic that are worth reading.

Nice case btw. There now seems to be a few high end case designs around that better support the cooling requirements of high end GPU's. The irony is that the GPU power/cooling requirements have dropped a bit with the GTX600 series, but a good case is still worth getting.
____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25559 - Posted: 7 Jun 2012 | 18:26:48 UTC - in response to Message 25549.

Do you think the ram will bottleneck? I know toms hardware was saying they think its a gimmick, but I saw the 3820 with only .2 ghz turbo boost, it was nice but it didnt really save on electricity. If I did spend the extra money I would want some electricity savings. Right now the bulldozers price is well below what it should be for such a powerful cpu. I would just rather run on 8 threads not hyper threaded than 4 ht. Plus the savings.

Simba123
Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 11
Posts: 147
Credit: 69,970,684
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25563 - Posted: 7 Jun 2012 | 22:54:17 UTC - in response to Message 25559.

Do you think the ram will bottleneck? I know toms hardware was saying they think its a gimmick, but I saw the 3820 with only .2 ghz turbo boost, it was nice but it didnt really save on electricity. If I did spend the extra money I would want some electricity savings. Right now the bulldozers price is well below what it should be for such a powerful cpu. I would just rather run on 8 threads not hyper threaded than 4 ht. Plus the savings.



The bulldozer is not a good CPU. It is effectively a 4 core but virtue of it's operation (shared floating point units). They also use more electricity than Intel Cpus, and do not support PCIE 3. In other words they are rubbish for multi-GPU crunching setups.

As with many things, spending more money up front will garner you savings down the track.

PSU - Corsair AX 1500. Best PSU you can buy, plus 7 year warranty.
THough, if you go with Kepler GPUs, you will probably only need either an AX1000 or AX 1200.
Work out your maximum power consumption, then add 30% and that is what you need in a power supply. That gives you extra leeway for expansion, allows the PSU to run cooler by not operating at it's maximum. PSU also operates at maximum electrical efficiency in this range as well - 70% load. It should also give you a good long service life for your PSU.

X79 (socket 2011) is the way to go if you want to run 3 or 4 GPUs. PCIE 3 bandwidth means no bottlenecks. Yes, the Motherboards and CPUs are much more expensive; they will pay you back by operating at a much higher performance level, with lower electrical consumption that a Bulldozer even could.


As for what GPU cards to run; best to wait and see before dropping the $$$$
Kepler (GTX670/680) is in beta testing at the moment (for GPUGrid). If the numbers come good, they will definitly be worth running over 570/580s.
Kepler produces less heat and has less electrical consumption than Fermi.


]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25567 - Posted: 8 Jun 2012 | 6:10:06 UTC - in response to Message 25563.

see i wasnt sure if amd still used floating point in their processors. I have heard bad things about it. like it means only a certain part of the processor does math. I guess I will start looking at intel then. I really dislike floating point, any other info you wanna share about floating point i would like to hear, thanks.

wiyosaya
Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 09
Posts: 114
Credit: 589,114,683
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25575 - Posted: 8 Jun 2012 | 15:02:10 UTC - in response to Message 25567.
Last modified: 8 Jun 2012 | 15:10:21 UTC

As I posted in another thread, I think it is highly unlikely that if you are running only GPUGrid that RAM will be overloaded even with 4 GPUs - regardless of CPU choice as long as that CPU is not too old.

I agree with skgiven that the better way may be to use 600 series GPUs. They are considerably more power efficient than the 500 series and that also means less heat to deal with. However, if you are planning on running any projects that require double-precision, such as MilkyWay@home, I personally think the 500 series is a better choice because the 600 series double-precision computation throughput is significantly less than the 500 series.

I personally think that the 3820 is likely much more efficient power wise than the BD chips, however, if the only reason for buying that is because of its memory bandwidth and you are running only GPU Grid or other distributed computing projects, I would recommend against the 3820.

Distributed computing projects, for the time being, do not need the inherent memory bandwidth of the 3820 or other SB-E CPU. In fact, about the only programs that need that kind of memory bandwidth are professional CAD programs, and professional FEA programs. As many hardware sites have stated, the 3820 also offers no advantage for gaming, either. I just built a rig with a 3820. I picked that CPU because of its performance for CAD and FEA. Running distributed computing projects on that machine is more of a secondary application, and for that, I chose a single GTX 580.

If you plan on doing serious gaming in addition to running distributed computing, then I would avoid BD. Basically, its gaming performance is terrible, and so is its single-threaded application performance. However, with multi-threaded apps, it sometimes outperforms Intel offerings, however, not all the time.

That said, if you only plan on running GPUGrid and no other distributed computing projects, then the BD chip may be a good, value oriented choice; otherwise, I would stick with Intel for now.

I also agree with Retvari. With many GPU offerings, they vent their heat inside the case, and with so many inside, it may become difficult to cool the system unless it is very well ventilated. The problem is to remove the heat from the case. In my 3820 system, if the GPU, which vents heat into the case, is crunching any WU from any GPU enabled project in which I participate, it pushes my CPU temp up about 8 - 9 degrees C.

Retvari's suggesting of water cooling, provided the radiator is external to the case, would likely provide the most efficient means of removing heat from the case. Otherwise, you will likely have to use a bunch of very noisy fans that may be disagreeable to you because of the noise.

The NZXT Gamma case has a lot of ventiallation. I own one, and think it is somewhat cheaply built, but it can be had for about $40 at most places. It may not have enough expansion slots for your particular application.

I built my 3820 with a Lian-Li PC-Z70 case. This is a pricy case, but I think it is well-built, lots of room for expansion cards and hard drives, provides plenty of ventilation, and has ports for water cooling tubes. You will probably need something like this that has plenty of expansion slot room.
____________

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25581 - Posted: 8 Jun 2012 | 21:03:57 UTC - in response to Message 25575.

Does nvidia support pci 3.0? I read they dont, not sure if its just the chipset or what. I think its all their drivers tho. C602 chipset would be my intel chipset. Also I have bought like 3 xeons online and they all had problems, so im about to buy a new one with sata support, is this like setting up a regular computer cause if you know could save me about 600 dollars. lol. I bought one where the hard drive was bad and my friend said i needed a new pata one, oh well 100 dollars anyways. so im suspicious. Ive built a couple computers tho so im starting to gain confidence 8D

5pot
Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 12
Posts: 411
Credit: 2,083,882,218
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25582 - Posted: 8 Jun 2012 | 21:08:00 UTC

NVIDIA does not currently "officially" support PCIe 3.0 on x79. HOWEVER, there is a very easy way to get it working.

I've got 2 cards both running at PCIe 3.0 on my x79 Sabertooth. 680 and a 670

Ken Florian
Send message
Joined: 4 May 12
Posts: 56
Credit: 1,832,989,878
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25587 - Posted: 9 Jun 2012 | 2:01:40 UTC - in response to Message 25549.

Then there are the GTX690's (combined TDP of 600W) - two of those would keep the running costs well down, and again an 850W PSU should suffice (assuming you don't start overclocking)..


Are you saying that 2 690s could be run on a high quality 850?

Ken

Paul Raney
Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 10
Posts: 115
Credit: 416,576,946
RAC: 0
Level
Gln
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25588 - Posted: 9 Jun 2012 | 2:51:51 UTC - in response to Message 25587.

You may want to look at using blowers to force air between the cards. Liquid cooling sounds great but it has plenty of other issues.

2 GTX 690s would be a great solution. I am still looking for a way to get 2 GTX 590s into a system.

Good Luck and start crunching!
____________
Thx - Paul

Note: Please don't use driver version 295 or 296! Recommended versions are 266 - 285.

Simba123
Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 11
Posts: 147
Credit: 69,970,684
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25591 - Posted: 9 Jun 2012 | 8:23:19 UTC - in response to Message 25587.

Then there are the GTX690's (combined TDP of 600W) - two of those would keep the running costs well down, and again an 850W PSU should suffice (assuming you don't start overclocking)..


Are you saying that 2 690s could be run on a high quality 850?

Ken



It would be close, and you definitely could not overclock anything.
600w for the 2 x 690
100w CPU
100w fans/hdds/dvd drives etc

800w total

A good 850 w could handle that; you'd probably want to go to a 1000w for a bit of safety or a 1200w if you want to overclock the CPU/GPU

Simba123
Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 11
Posts: 147
Credit: 69,970,684
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25592 - Posted: 9 Jun 2012 | 8:31:38 UTC - in response to Message 25575.

[quote]As I posted in another thread, I think it is highly unlikely that if you are running only GPUGrid that RAM will be overloaded even with 4 GPUs - regardless of CPU choice as long as that CPU is not too old.

I agree with skgiven that the better way may be to use 600 series GPUs. They are considerably more power efficient than the 500 series and that also means less heat to deal with. However, if you are planning on running any projects that require double-precision, such as MilkyWay@home, I personally think the 500 series is a better choice because the 600 series double-precision computation throughput is significantly less than the 500 series.

I personally think that the 3820 is likely much more efficient power wise than the BD chips, however, if the only reason for buying that is because of its memory bandwidth and you are running only GPU Grid or other distributed computing projects, I would recommend against the 3820.

Distributed computing projects, for the time being, do not need the inherent memory bandwidth of the 3820 or other SB-E CPU. In fact, about the only programs that need that kind of memory bandwidth are professional CAD programs, and professional FEA programs. As many hardware sites have stated, the 3820 also offers no advantage for gaming, either. I just built a rig with a 3820. I picked that CPU because of its performance for CAD and FEA. Running distributed computing projects on that machine is more of a secondary application, and for that, I chose a single GTX 580.

If you plan on doing serious gaming in addition to running distributed computing, then I would avoid BD. Basically, its gaming performance is terrible, and so is its single-threaded application performance. However, with multi-threaded apps, it sometimes outperforms Intel offerings, however, not all the time.

That said, if you only plan on running GPUGrid and no other distributed computing projects, then the BD chip may be a good, value oriented choice; otherwise, I would stick with Intel for now.

<snip>

Not quite. running 2 cards won't need PCIE3, however running 3 or more, I have seen several reviews showing substantial gains from PCIE3.
on an x79 system all 4 GPUs will still run at x16 speed whereas
on a p67 4 GPUs would be reduced to a mere x4 each.

It has been said, and I'll agree, there is no gaming benefit to SB-E.
This sounds like it will be a dedicated Crunching rig that would benefit from the extra bandwidth if he is going to run 4 GPUs.

5pot
Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 12
Posts: 411
Credit: 2,083,882,218
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25595 - Posted: 9 Jun 2012 | 11:52:31 UTC

SB-E only has 40 lanes. Only 2 cards can run at x16 at any given time. If you buy a mobo with 3 slots like I did, it's x16,x16, x8. 4 slot mobos usually default to x16, x8, x8,x8.

Simba123
Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 11
Posts: 147
Credit: 69,970,684
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25603 - Posted: 9 Jun 2012 | 23:11:18 UTC - in response to Message 25595.

SB-E only has 40 lanes. Only 2 cards can run at x16 at any given time. If you buy a mobo with 3 slots like I did, it's x16,x16, x8. 4 slot mobos usually default to x16, x8, x8,x8.



Sorry, I wasn't being clear.
I'm assuming he does the registry hack so that PCIE is enabled.
Remember that PCIE 3 is twice as fast as PCIE 2.

So, the cards would run at PCIE3 x8 (4x8 = 32 lanes used)
which is the same as all cards running at PCIE2 x16

As I said earlier, running 2 cards in sli or crunching gains nothing from SB-E
however running 3 or more does make use of the extra bandwidth available, and does see performance gains.

It's also important that x79 boards are designed to run 4 cards, and have the extra molex connectors for PCIE power that many/most p67 z77 boards don't have. This is really important for crunching. Maxing out the cards without that connector runs a high risk of frying the PCIE slot and/or the 12v line in the 24pin motherboard connector.


this[url] http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?279308-Vega-s-*Heavyweight*-display-and-computer-edition-2012&p=5081386&viewfull=1#post5081386[/url] thread has some interesting info/videos on the topic at hand.

fractal
Send message
Joined: 16 Aug 08
Posts: 87
Credit: 1,248,879,715
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25948 - Posted: 27 Jun 2012 | 23:51:48 UTC

One other factor to consider in a 1500W PSU if you choose to continue down this path is feeding it.

1500W is about as much as you can safely draw from a dedicated 120V, 15 amp wall plug circuit. I believe the electrical code only lets you load a circuit to 80% of its rating with plug in devices which limits you to 12 amps at 120v. A dedicated 20 amp circuit would handle it fine with the proper (#12 AWG) power cord. A 220V circuit would be even better as all the efficiency curves I have seen are better when fed with 220V.

Using more power efficient GPU's is, of course, a more prudent idea. The savings in electricity will pay for the more expensive cards fairly quickly.

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25956 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012 | 9:56:49 UTC - in response to Message 25948.

Is 1500 watt for the entire outlet? meaning I should only run one extension cord from one wall outlet per 1500 watts. This seems very important to me. I dont mind running extension cords from other places in my house. If the outlets are on the same breaker then its beyond my knowledge anyways. I guess I will end up buying an extension cord with this build. Im starting my intel build with core 2 quad, altho it only has one gpu slot, I want to be sure I can handle the intel build before I spend bigger bucks. I also dont want to melt my sockets as I did by plugging two air conditioners to a strip so if you got some info 2 share 8D

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25957 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012 | 9:59:21 UTC - in response to Message 25956.

You say 15 amp wall circuit plug so I assume you mean more than one outlet, directly from the breaker box. Is this the case? I dont really understand my breaker box and just kinda pray I dont start a fire. Can more than one outlet come off the circuit? def buying extension cord.

Paul Raney
Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 10
Posts: 115
Credit: 416,576,946
RAC: 0
Level
Gln
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25958 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012 | 10:42:56 UTC - in response to Message 25957.

You can have many outlets on circuit. In most bedrooms, all of the outlets are on 1 circuit. Bathrooms and kitchens usually have more of a 1 circuit to outlet relationship. With a dedicated 20A circuit, you will have 1 outlet directly connected to a 20A breaker in the box. Using the 80% rule, you could draw 16AMPs on that circuit or (110V * 16AMPs) = 1760 Watts. You can draw more than that, up to a max of 2200 Watts but the breaker would trip at anything greater than 20AMPs.

Your breaker box is just a power distribution box. All of your power comes in on one line, a 220V line at around 200 AMPs. The breaker box splits this 220V feed into 2 110V feeds. In the US we typically call this 120 but it is usually more like 110V. You can also add double gang breakers that touch both 110V legs in the box to get 220V power for water heaters, ovens, stoves, dryers, etc.

If you overload a circuit, it will trip the breaker (no big deal, that is what the breaker is designed to do), just reset and try again. If it happens again, you have overloaded the circuit and you need to get that extension cord.

I have a Core 2 Quad over clocked by 50% + 2 GTX 580s overclocked to 962MHz and a 21" monitor on one outlet with no problems. You might be shocked to see just how much a singled 110V outlet will provide.
____________
Thx - Paul

Note: Please don't use driver version 295 or 296! Recommended versions are 266 - 285.

]{LiK`Rangers`
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 12
Posts: 117
Credit: 77,256,014
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 25961 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012 | 11:29:52 UTC - in response to Message 25958.

well I found my outlet map, the person who lived here before me made. It has them all except one. One circuit doesnt work, and one has only two prongs. I am interested in how much a two prong can handle. Anyways, I got alot of power now anyways.

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : affordable/reliable 1600 watt psu plz.

//