Message boards : GPUGRID CAFE : Cost saving using GPUGRID instead of supercomputer
Author | Message |
---|---|
Let's say we want to build a supercomputer with the same computational throughput as GPUGRID. | |
ID: 25730 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Somehow I can't edit my original post. But 400,000 GFLOPs are 400 TFLOPs of course, not PFLOPs. | |
ID: 25838 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Somehow I can't edit my original post. You can only edit your post for 1h. ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help | |
ID: 25839 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
And with the power in this hour (serverstats) we are powering an supercomputer that would fit into a great Place 37 on the Top 500 List of Supercomputers :) | |
ID: 26772 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
4x690 in 18 computers would be half the electricity cost. 400W power use per 690 card (measured), 200W for CPU and SSD, so 1800W per computer, divided by XFX 850+850+550 PSUs or a hugely expensive but more compact one (I say XFX because they have all the wattage on just one rail, and is guaranteed to give the said amount of power, so they're very easy to interconnect). | |
ID: 26994 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
A GTX690 has a TDP of 300W. Here it's likely to be using around 225W while running (Not 400W)! I doubt it would use more than 250W. | |
ID: 27220 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : GPUGRID CAFE : Cost saving using GPUGRID instead of supercomputer