Message boards : Number crunching : 1-GERARD_MO_MOR WUs failing immediately
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Beyond Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications    | |
|
A couple examples: | |
ID: 44012 | Rating: 0 | rate:
 /   Reply
Quote
| |
|
Bedrich Hajek Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 486 Credit: 11,380,049,620 RAC: 9,055,607 Level  Scientific publications   | |
A couple examples: Same thing here! Name e1s34_1-GERARD_MO_MOR_1-0-1-RND2358_2 Workunit 11674055 Created 18 Jul 2016 | 14:57:53 UTC Sent 18 Jul 2016 | 14:57:56 UTC Received 18 Jul 2016 | 19:18:31 UTC Server state Over Outcome Computation error Client state Compute error Exit status -98 (0xffffffffffffff9e) Unknown error number Computer ID 263612 Report deadline 23 Jul 2016 | 14:57:56 UTC Run time 3.25 CPU time 1.22 Validate state Invalid Credit 0.00 Application version Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.48 (cuda65) Stderr output <core_client_version>7.6.22</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> (unknown error) - exit code -98 (0xffffff9e) </message> <stderr_txt> # GPU [GeForce GTX 980 Ti] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [65] # SWAN Device 0 : # Name : GeForce GTX 980 Ti # ECC : Disabled # Global mem : 4095MB # Capability : 5.2 # PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0 # Device clock : 1266MHz # Memory clock : 3505MHz # Memory width : 384bit # Driver version : r358_00 : 35906 ERROR: file force.cpp line 513: TCL evaluation of [calcforces] 15:16:11 (6520): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Name e1s41_1-GERARD_MO_MOR_2-0-1-RND9697_0 Workunit 11674112 Created 18 Jul 2016 | 12:13:48 UTC Sent 18 Jul 2016 | 12:40:09 UTC Received 18 Jul 2016 | 19:18:31 UTC Server state Over Outcome Computation error Client state Compute error Exit status -98 (0xffffffffffffff9e) Unknown error number Computer ID 263612 Report deadline 23 Jul 2016 | 12:40:09 UTC Run time 3.45 CPU time 1.17 Validate state Invalid Credit 0.00 Application version Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.48 (cuda65) Stderr output <core_client_version>7.6.22</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> (unknown error) - exit code -98 (0xffffff9e) </message> <stderr_txt> # GPU [GeForce GTX 980 Ti] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [65] # SWAN Device 0 : # Name : GeForce GTX 980 Ti # ECC : Disabled # Global mem : 4095MB # Capability : 5.2 # PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0 # Device clock : 1266MHz # Memory clock : 3505MHz # Memory width : 384bit # Driver version : r358_00 : 35906 ERROR: file force.cpp line 513: TCL evaluation of [calcforces] 15:16:07 (2340): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> | |
| ID: 44016 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
[AF>Amis des Lapins]Abidi... Send message Joined: 22 Dec 12 Posts: 2 Credit: 272,996,387 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
Same here : | |
| ID: 44018 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Bedrich Hajek Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 486 Credit: 11,380,049,620 RAC: 9,055,607 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I had 2 more of these units error out: | |
| ID: 44021 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Greger Send message Joined: 6 Jan 15 Posts: 76 Credit: 24,838,607,682 RAC: 35,109,661 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Same here 90.45% ends to fail, what can we do about it, and how does these 9.55 manage to success to those wu:s? 3-4 sec this time so low lost but would like to see low error rate. | |
| ID: 44023 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1626 Credit: 9,362,966,723 RAC: 18,909,192 Level Scientific publications  | |
|
I had e1s27_1-GERARD_MO_MOR_1-0-1-RND0098 - reached maximum number of errors with no successful returns at all. | |
| ID: 44024 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester  Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
90% fail rate says there is a problem with the model. | |
| ID: 44025 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Beyond Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Same here 90.45% ends to fail, what can we do about it, and how does these 9.55 manage to success to those wu:s? 3-4 sec this time so low lost but would like to see low error rate. Because the 0-GERARD_MO_MOR WUs seem OK while the 1-GERARD_MO_MOR WUs all fail. All the admins are apparently either on vacation or asleep. >> Why are we not using a beta queue to test such tasks? We're open to theories... | |
| ID: 44027 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Message boards : Number crunching : 1-GERARD_MO_MOR WUs failing immediately
