Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Might be a good idea...

Author Message
Betting Slip
Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 09
Posts: 670
Credit: 2,498,095,550
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 45666 - Posted: 12 Dec 2016 | 9:06:32 UTC

...to go back to past prctice of resending WU's after 48hrs as it used to be in the past.

This would stop hosts delaying tasks for 5 days, speed up turnaround and make more work available quicker.

Profile caffeineyellow5
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 14
Posts: 225
Credit: 2,658,976,345
RAC: 0
Level
Phe
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 45674 - Posted: 12 Dec 2016 | 15:47:02 UTC

Agreed.
____________
1 Corinthians 9:16 "For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!"
Ephesians 6:18-20, please ;-)
http://tbc-pa.org

Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2305
Credit: 16,131,308,517
RAC: 2,393,918
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 45678 - Posted: 12 Dec 2016 | 17:01:27 UTC - in response to Message 45674.
Last modified: 12 Dec 2016 | 17:03:13 UTC

I disagree. However a smarter scheduler would be much better.
Alternatively we could set the deadline for 3 days, but no re-sends please.
The re-sends won't solve the shortage in the long term, only for a very short time.

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Might be a good idea...