Advanced search

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : 980ti vs 1070

Author Message
PappaLitto
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 16
Posts: 263
Credit: 1,199,747,831
RAC: 4,730,021
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwat
Message 45946 - Posted: 29 Dec 2016 | 11:38:20 UTC

In terms of compute time for similar WUs, I'm just curious how they stack up to each other with examples etc.

PappaLitto
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 16
Posts: 263
Credit: 1,199,747,831
RAC: 4,730,021
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwat
Message 45951 - Posted: 29 Dec 2016 | 13:06:38 UTC - in response to Message 45946.

TFLOPS aren't everything, the different versions of ACEMD play a large part in speed.

Riaan
Send message
Joined: 16 Dec 10
Posts: 4
Credit: 19,812,500
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
wat
Message 46013 - Posted: 31 Dec 2016 | 4:17:08 UTC - in response to Message 45946.

Hi Pappalito,

Below is the results of my 1070:

# GPU [GeForce GTX 1070] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [80]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 1070
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 8192MB
# Capability : 6.1
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1835MHz
# Memory clock : 4004MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r376_06 : 37619
# GPU 0 : 59C
# GPU 0 : 60C
# GPU 0 : 61C
# GPU 0 : 62C
# GPU 0 : 63C
# GPU [GeForce GTX 1070] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [80]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 1070
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 8192MB
# Capability : 6.1
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1835MHz
# Memory clock : 4004MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r376_06 : 37619
# GPU 0 : 59C
# GPU 0 : 61C
# GPU 0 : 62C
# GPU 0 : 63C
# GPU 0 : 64C
# GPU [GeForce GTX 1070] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [80]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 1070
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 8192MB
# Capability : 6.1
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1835MHz
# Memory clock : 4004MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r376_06 : 37619
# GPU 0 : 52C
# GPU 0 : 56C
# GPU 0 : 59C
# GPU 0 : 60C
# GPU 0 : 61C
# GPU 0 : 62C
# GPU 0 : 63C
# GPU 0 : 64C
# GPU 0 : 65C
# GPU 0 : 66C
# GPU [GeForce GTX 1070] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [80]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 1070
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 8192MB
# Capability : 6.1
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1835MHz
# Memory clock : 4004MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r376_06 : 37619
# GPU 0 : 50C
# GPU 0 : 55C
# GPU 0 : 58C
# GPU 0 : 59C
# GPU 0 : 61C
# GPU 0 : 62C
# GPU 0 : 63C
# GPU 0 : 64C
# GPU 0 : 65C
# GPU [GeForce GTX 1070] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [80]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 1070
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 8192MB
# Capability : 6.1
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1835MHz
# Memory clock : 4004MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r376_06 : 37619
# GPU 0 : 56C
# GPU 0 : 58C
# GPU 0 : 59C
# GPU 0 : 60C
# GPU 0 : 61C
# GPU 0 : 62C
# GPU 0 : 63C
# GPU [GeForce GTX 1070] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [80]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 1070
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 8192MB
# Capability : 6.1
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1835MHz
# Memory clock : 4004MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r376_06 : 37619
# GPU 0 : 61C
# GPU 0 : 62C
# GPU 0 : 63C
# GPU 0 : 64C
# GPU [GeForce GTX 1070] Platform [Windows] Rev [3212] VERSION [80]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 1070
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 8192MB
# Capability : 6.1
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1835MHz
# Memory clock : 4004MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r376_06 : 37619
# GPU 0 : 57C
# GPU 0 : 58C
# GPU 0 : 59C
# GPU 0 : 60C
# GPU 0 : 61C
# Time per step (avg over 425000 steps): 3.616 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 45201.641 s
# PERFORMANCE: 87452 Natoms 3.616 ns/day 0.000 ms/step 0.000 us/step/atom
called boinc_finish

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : 980ti vs 1070