Advanced search

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : 24hr Back Off Causing No Work....

Author Message
Profile The Gas Giant
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 08
Posts: 54
Credit: 607,157
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 6854 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 3:26:54 UTC

I have seen that when there I get the "No work available for your type of computer" message BOINC backs off 24hrs. (I think this is a project setting). This means that I run out of work and my GPU sits idle. Any chance of reducing this time?

Many thanks...

Profile Paul D. Buck
Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 08
Posts: 1050
Credit: 37,321,185
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6858 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 4:36:18 UTC - in response to Message 6854.

I have seen that when there I get the "No work available for your type of computer" message BOINC backs off 24hrs. (I think this is a project setting). This means that I run out of work and my GPU sits idle. Any chance of reducing this time?

Many thanks...


Exponential back-off, lord I wish they would use that instead ... especially since there is a "cap" of 4 tasks in the queue ... which means I run dry in 6 hours or so ... tops ... on my most productive system ...

I know they want to limit the loss of tasks and tasks completed are used to build the next series ... and the project is pretty reliable and on-line time is one of the best ... but ... jeeze guys ... look at my i7, 4 cores, few errors ...

MarkJ
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 08
Posts: 738
Credit: 200,909,904
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6859 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 6:54:36 UTC - in response to Message 6854.

I have seen that when there I get the "No work available for your type of computer" message BOINC backs off 24hrs. (I think this is a project setting). This means that I run out of work and my GPU sits idle. Any chance of reducing this time?

Many thanks...


I got this yesterday after getting two tasks.

If you turn on sched_op_debug you will see that the project is indeed requesting the 24hr backoff. As Paul alluded to it isn't exponential. I guess they don't have enough work for all of us.

I would have thought a smaller backoff like 1 hour (or 2) would be sufficent. Maybe GDF would care to comment.
____________
BOINC blog

J.D.
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 09
Posts: 40
Credit: 16,762,688
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6860 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 6:58:02 UTC - in response to Message 6858.

Exponential back-off, lord I wish they would use that instead ... especially since there is a "cap" of 4 tasks in the queue ...


The cap of 8 tasks total regardless of the number of GPUs or CPUs isn't very helpful. When will they implement a cap based upon a multiple of the GPU count?

The 24-hour back off seems especially silly when the central server only goes down for 10 or 15 minutes.

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 6862 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 9:54:51 UTC - in response to Message 6860.

We have not changed anything.

gdf

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6864 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 11:18:17 UTC - in response to Message 6862.

Any chance you could change the 24h back-off to something smaller?

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 6868 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 11:49:21 UTC - in response to Message 6864.

We have not set this anywhere. It must be something of BOINC.
There is no reason for it to be like that though.
Does anyone know how to change this parameter?

gdf

Profile Bender10
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Dec 07
Posts: 167
Credit: 8,368,897
RAC: 0
Level
Ser
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6869 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 12:25:58 UTC - in response to Message 6868.

I don't think you can change it from this end. I think it is tied the the whole Work Fetch (Scheduler, GPU and LTD) minefield...and must be resolved by the Boinc Team.
____________


Consciousness: That annoying time between naps......

Experience is a wonderful thing: it enables you to recognize a mistake every time you repeat it.

Copycat-Digital for WCG*
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,000,641
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 6877 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 15:37:45 UTC - in response to Message 6868.
Last modified: 22 Feb 2009 | 15:56:34 UTC

I’m experiencing the same problem since I installed a 2nd 9600GT.
Boinc is running fine (E4600 Due + 2 x 9600GT) 2 x CPU & 2 x GPU tasks.
Tried Boinc 6.69 but I get the same 24 hours back off after a task completes.
Only get 1 new task after a manual update even with cache set at 10 days
Need to babysit project to get it to run 24/7

Just installed Boinc 6.6.10 - Will wait & see what happens when a task completes
____________

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6886 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 17:38:18 UTC - in response to Message 6877.

Did you try 6.5.0? That one should request enough work for both GPUs.

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Copycat-Digital for WCG*
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,000,641
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 6894 - Posted: 22 Feb 2009 | 19:46:06 UTC - in response to Message 6886.

Did you try 6.5.0? That one should request enough work for both GPUs.

MrS

Not yet. Will try it and report back

Copycat-Digital for WCG*
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,000,641
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 6917 - Posted: 23 Feb 2009 | 6:11:45 UTC - in response to Message 6894.

Did you try 6.5.0? That one should request enough work for both GPUs.

MrS

Not yet. Will try it and report back


Thanks! Looks like 6.5.0 fixed the 24 hr delay

Profile Paul D. Buck
Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 08
Posts: 1050
Credit: 37,321,185
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6918 - Posted: 23 Feb 2009 | 6:55:41 UTC - in response to Message 6917.

Thanks! Looks like 6.5.0 fixed the 24 hr delay


No, that is a server function. But 6.5.0 is better behaved. If you get the right kind of "miss" from the server, you will still see the 24 hour Back off ...

IN GENERAL, though, 6.5.0 is less likely to get hits on that ... but it is not guaranteed ...

I sent some notes to the project in a PM, not sure if they will help ... I hope they will ... with luck they will ...

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 6919 - Posted: 23 Feb 2009 | 8:33:47 UTC - in response to Message 6918.
Last modified: 23 Feb 2009 | 18:46:33 UTC

Thanks to Paul's suggestion, now the server should force a WU request every 3 hours maximum.
Let see if this improves it.

gdf

Profile Paul D. Buck
Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 08
Posts: 1050
Credit: 37,321,185
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6938 - Posted: 23 Feb 2009 | 18:20:29 UTC - in response to Message 6919.

Thanks to Paul's suggestion, now the server should force a WU request every 3 hours maximum.
Let see if this improve it.


Yea! Thank you GDF ... we love you ...

Profile The Gas Giant
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 08
Posts: 54
Credit: 607,157
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 6943 - Posted: 23 Feb 2009 | 20:05:34 UTC

Thanks to all for putting the effort in. My gpu should be happier now ;)

Profile Bender10
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Dec 07
Posts: 167
Credit: 8,368,897
RAC: 0
Level
Ser
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 6948 - Posted: 23 Feb 2009 | 22:02:00 UTC - in response to Message 6943.
Last modified: 23 Feb 2009 | 22:05:30 UTC

Sounds like a good fix..except...I guess it depends on which client you are running (stable Linux-64....6.4.5)...

Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:54:04 PM EST|GPUGRID|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 53678 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:54:14 PM EST|GPUGRID|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:54:14 PM EST|GPUGRID|Message from server: No work sent
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:54:14 PM EST|GPUGRID|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 1 tasks)
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:54:14 PM EST|GPUGRID|Message from server: (Project has no jobs available)

Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:58:17 PM EST|GPUGRID|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 56520 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:58:22 PM EST|GPUGRID|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:58:22 PM EST|GPUGRID|Message from server: No work sent
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:58:22 PM EST|GPUGRID|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 1 tasks)
Mon 23 Feb 2009 04:58:22 PM EST|GPUGRID|Message from server: (Project has no jobs available)

This is happening every 4 minutes...

EDIT: the timing of this is very sporatic. was just every 4 minutes. earlier it was about 14 minutes. It goes for a while, stops, then starts up with another time interval...very funny.
____________


Consciousness: That annoying time between naps......

Experience is a wonderful thing: it enables you to recognize a mistake every time you repeat it.

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 7016 - Posted: 26 Feb 2009 | 20:56:44 UTC - in response to Message 6948.

Not sure what you want to say, really. I'm seeing that you reached the maximum allowed queue size, which has nothing to do with the 24h-back-off-fix.

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : 24hr Back Off Causing No Work....

//