Cancelled by server

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Cancelled by server

Author	Message
frankhagen Send message Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 65 Credit: 3,037,414 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 9001 - Posted: 27 Apr 2009 \| 17:22:03 UTC
	is this by purpose, or what? initial replication 10 and killing running jobs??? wuid=415152 590172 32612 27 Apr 2009 9:28:08 UTC 2 May 2009 9:28:08 UTC In progress --- New --- --- --- 590173 29707 27 Apr 2009 9:27:30 UTC 27 Apr 2009 15:58:46 UTC Over Redundant result Cancelled by server 3,358.81 3,946.78 --- 590174 22935 27 Apr 2009 9:27:59 UTC 2 May 2009 9:27:59 UTC In progress --- New --- --- --- 590175 18304 27 Apr 2009 9:28:07 UTC 27 Apr 2009 16:03:36 UTC Over Redundant result Cancelled by server 0.00 --- --- 590176 23183 27 Apr 2009 9:28:20 UTC 2 May 2009 9:28:20 UTC In progress --- New --- --- --- 590177 33634 27 Apr 2009 9:29:38 UTC 2 May 2009 9:29:38 UTC In progress --- New --- --- --- 590178 30738 27 Apr 2009 9:29:00 UTC 27 Apr 2009 16:15:14 UTC Over Redundant result Cancelled by server 0.00 --- --- 590179 28591 27 Apr 2009 9:31:41 UTC 2 May 2009 9:31:41 UTC In progress --- New --- --- --- 590180 19103 27 Apr 2009 9:27:25 UTC 27 Apr 2009 15:55:04 UTC Over Redundant result Cancelled by server 0.00 --- --- 590181 16930 27 Apr 2009 9:29:06 UTC 27 Apr 2009 16:13:09 UTC Over Redundant result Cancelled by server 11.40 3,946.78 ---
	ID: 9001 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Fuzzy Duck Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 6 Credit: 6,972,294 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 9003 - Posted: 27 Apr 2009 \| 18:30:31 UTC - in response to Message 9001. Last modified: 27 Apr 2009 \| 18:39:45 UTC
	I just had a similar problem, with a partially completed WU cancelled after 10 hours (approx 80% complete). 27/04/2009 19:19:54 GPUGRID Message from server: Result p1380000-GIANNI_pYIpYVk12204-6-10-RND8950_0 is no longer usable 27/04/2009 19:19:55 GPUGRID Computation for task p1380000-GIANNI_pYIpYVk12204-6-10-RND8950_0 finished Is this by design or is it an error??? Here is the WU in question. http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=413724
	ID: 9003 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Toni Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 9015 - Posted: 27 Apr 2009 \| 20:49:07 UTC - in response to Message 9003. Last modified: 28 Apr 2009 \| 9:00:23 UTC
	We cancelled a set (hopefully small) of running WUs. That happened in relation to a fix reported in another thread (download error). In handling the huge amount of GPUs that you generously donate we struggle, from time to time, with the unpredictable... Replication for most jobs is 1 or 2 for a few. Some were created with 10 in a prototype we were testing to "push" late WUs.
	ID: 9015 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

frankhagen Send message Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 65 Credit: 3,037,414 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 9016 - Posted: 27 Apr 2009 \| 20:53:57 UTC - in response to Message 9015.
	hmm - if things like this happen, you should at least grant some credit for the killed WUs. it's not funny to loose several hours of crunching time due to a faulty scheduler-setup..
	ID: 9016 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

DoctorNow Send message Joined: 18 Aug 07 Posts: 83 Credit: 122,995,082 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 9041 - Posted: 28 Apr 2009 \| 3:40:42 UTC - in response to Message 9016. Last modified: 28 Apr 2009 \| 3:41:34 UTC
	hmm - if things like this happen, you should at least grant some credit for the killed WUs. it's not funny to loose several hours of crunching time due to a faulty scheduler-setup.. I saw this on the WU on one of my team mates. The problem is, when the WU is marked as redundant, the reported WU doesn't contain how long it has run in the log file, and she said it was already at 50%! So it isn't even possible to grant partial credits. ____________ Member of BOINC@Heidelberg and ATA!
	ID: 9041 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

mscharmack Send message Joined: 20 Aug 07 Posts: 18 Credit: 1,319,274 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 9044 - Posted: 28 Apr 2009 \| 4:05:05 UTC
	I've had that done to me also, 90% plus (about 18 hours work) done and chopped off at the knees. A big fat "GOOSE EGG" for the credit. I've started to abort work units where the initial replication is more than "1"
	ID: 9044 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 9074 - Posted: 28 Apr 2009 \| 16:05:29 UTC - in response to Message 9044.
	This is not a problem of replication. Replication does not cancel the workunit if you are running it. It's a problem that WUs were manually canceled to eliminate the one with download result problems, some of these had the files and were actually running. gdf
	ID: 9074 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Cancelled by server

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate