Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Should it be checking report date on start up?

Post to thread Subscribe Sort
Author Message
_Jim_
Send message
Joined: 3 Jan 08
Posts: 7
Credit: 175,308
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 948 - Posted: 8 Mar 2008 | 16:48:27 UTC

I have a wu that is running for 111 hours. That is not the poroblem it is 3 day past due I was playing a game yesterday so on start up it should have been 2 days past due. I will be aborting the wu when I turn it back on right now I am going to play R6:V.

ID: 948 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 960 - Posted: 10 Mar 2008 | 11:20:34 UTC - in response to Message 948.

I have a wu that is running for 111 hours. That is not the poroblem it is 3 day past due I was playing a game yesterday so on start up it should have been 2 days past due. I will be aborting the wu when I turn it back on right now I am going to play R6:V.


Yes abort. In particular if it is called TIM3.

ID: 960 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Should it be checking report date on start up?

//