Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Tasks acemd2 versus acemdlong

Author Message
Profile Carlesa25
Send message
Joined: 13 Nov 10
Posts: 328
Credit: 72,619,453
RAC: 0
Scientific publications
Message 22475 - Posted: 5 Nov 2011 | 15:51:07 UTC

Hello: I know and agree, that the main thing is to participate and help make the project progress and tasks ... well.

In several threads I read the complaint or that it is difficult to understand the large difference in score between some tasks and others, especially between the normal and long.

I think the situation is somewhat similar to the issue, now resolved, the final two days of homework and problems.

I sincerely believe that, although with repeated explanations in different thread on the subject, technically it is clear, it is not logically.

Program directors believe they would have to reconsider its Police de bonuses depending on the load of the tasks and make it linear, irrespective of complex considerations of time and average error during the execution etc ...

It is simply to give the bonus in relation to the average execution time of a task, without going into further elaboration.

It would solve the problem of short tasks have low demand, very little seems to me there is always 3000 of the first 200 of the latter. Greetings.

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Tasks acemd2 versus acemdlong