Message boards : Number crunching : Nathan FAX versus Nathan CB
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Both wu's have almost the same timetable to crunch on my pc (nvidia 460 SE.) The difference...6000 credits less points when I chew on a Nathan FAX wu. Nathan FAX wu 30.000 credits. Nathan CB wu almost 36.000 credits. Can anybody please explain this credit difference? | |
ID: 23848 | Rating: 0 | rate:
 /   Reply
Quote
| |
|
I woke up this morning to a NATHAN_FAX WU running on my ASUS OCed 460. The longest time I've seen on other WUs is 16.5 hours. This one is scheduled to take a total of 29 hours!! I guess it's goodbye to bonuses with a NATHAN_FAX... | |
| ID: 23850 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
 Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,249,865,968 RAC: 4,089,892 Level  Scientific publications   | |
|
Your workunit is a NATHAN_FAX3, which is the 'elongated' version of the NATHAN_FAX. They made that long because there were some complaints about the so called 'long' workunits not taking much longer than the normal ones. As everyone can see, this series of workunits do take much longer than the short ones. | |
| ID: 23851 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Damaraland Send message Joined: 7 Nov 09 Posts: 152 Credit: 16,181,924 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications    | |
|
I have a I2R35_NATHAN_FAX3 that I estimate it's going to take 31 h. called 'long' workunits not taking much longer than the normal ones Normally long units took me before around 7h. So I see this reasanoble. I see that the 3 means x3 ____________ HOW TO - Full installation Ubuntu 11.10 | |
| ID: 23852 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,249,865,968 RAC: 4,089,892 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Venec's host completed one of these really long NATHAN_FAX3 in 13 hours 17 minutes on a factory clocked GTX 580. | |
| ID: 23854 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Message boards : Number crunching : Nathan FAX versus Nathan CB
