Author |
Message |
tomba Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 497 Credit: 700,690,702 RAC: 0 Level
Scientific publications
|
My modest GTX 460 always completes long Noelias in time for the full bonus, until...
Two days ago I upgraded from 310.90 to 341.07. Since then the two WUs I completed went over 24 hours, and the current WU will do the same.
I just went back to 310.90.
____________
|
|
|
Jim1348Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level
Scientific publications
|
On my GTX 560 and 650 Ti, I upgraded from 310.90 to 314.70 and saw no change. In fact, I do a lot of Folding work, and have never seen any change in performance due to Nvidia drivers, starting with a GTX 450 and on through a 550 Ti, 560 Ti, and 660 in addition to the ones mentioned above.
That is not to say that I have not seen reduced output, but that has never been due to the new drivers themselves, but to not doing a clean uninstall of the old drivers. To do a clean uninstall, you first remove them from the Control Panel ("Programs and Features" in Win7), NOT from the Device Manager. Then, remove the remaining registry entries using Driver Fusion (successor to Driver Sweeper), rebooting as instructed.
That cleanly removes the old drivers, but you also need to ensure that no other drivers were installed by Windows automatically when you rebooted after removing the old ones. It helps to disconnect from the Internet so that new ones are not downloaded automatically. But even so, old ones might still be on your disk. To check, you can go to Device Manager and see what is there; if they are not the default Microsoft VGA drivers, uninstall them, this time using Device Manager, and delete them from the disk! Then, you can upgrade to the new ones without a problem. |
|
|
Beyond Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level
Scientific publications
|
On my GTX 560 and 650 Ti, I upgraded from 310.90 to 314.70 and saw no change. In fact, I do a lot of Folding work, and have never seen any change in performance due to Nvidia drivers, starting with a GTX 450 and on through a 550 Ti, 560 Ti, and 660 in addition to the ones mentioned above.
There was a sizable increase in performance not too awfully long ago with the newer NVidia and ATI/AMD drivers in POEM, but that's OpenCL and also has very high CPU requirements. If memory serves, the performance increase was around 15% for NV and a total of about 30% (across 2 performance updates) for the AMD team.
|
|
|
Jim1348Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level
Scientific publications
|
On my GTX 560 and 650 Ti, I upgraded from 310.90 to 314.70 and saw no change. In fact, I do a lot of Folding work, and have never seen any change in performance due to Nvidia drivers, starting with a GTX 450 and on through a 550 Ti, 560 Ti, and 660 in addition to the ones mentioned above.
There was a sizable increase in performance not too awfully long ago with the newer NVidia and ATI/AMD drivers in POEM, but that's OpenCL and also has very high CPU requirements. If memory serves, the performance increase was around 15% for NV and a total of about 30% (across 2 performance updates) for the AMD team.
Yes, I have seen the increase in POEM on an HD 7770, and it also helped WCG/HCC too, though not as much. But CUDA is another story, and apparently doesn't change much. I think the new drivers mainly correct problems in 3D games, etc. |
|
|
Chilean Send message
Joined: 8 Oct 12 Posts: 98 Credit: 385,652,461 RAC: 0 Level
Scientific publications
|
I couldn't surpass the 130 MHz overclock limit with the new drivers, so I reverted back to 310.90. |
|
|
Dylan Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 12 Posts: 98 Credit: 386,043,752 RAC: 0 Level
Scientific publications
|
Haven't experienced any issues yet with the new driver on a 670. |
|
|
skgivenVolunteer moderator Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level
Scientific publications
|
I will reiterate that for GPUGrid 'upgrading' the driver generally yields nothing positive.
In my experience, you typically end up with the exact same performance for crunching or very slightly less (~1%), usually only noticeable on lesser cards.
If you have a stable crunching system, don't touch it. Changing a driver just introduces the chance to encounter problems.
Here the apps have to be built to exploit new code that improves CUDA performance.
While there are many CUDA improvements with time, not all of these benefit this project. Even if they did the researchers could't develop for, test and bring out a new app every month while doing useful research.
In reality it's only once or twice a year that we see significant changes in CUDA that would improve performances for some GPUGrid apps. Often these CUDA improvements are only realized when using the newest cards.
If there is an announcement that GPUGrid will be using a new app, find out if your driver supports this apps CUDA, for example CUDA 4.2, and only upgrade your driver if your card doesn't support it.
While some drivers can also bring stability, if your card isn't unstable, there is no point in upgrading. Even if your GPU is unstable, there is no guarantee that a random new driver will fix your stability problems.
As others have stated, drivers generally just bring improvements to games.
____________
FAQ's
HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help |
|
|