Message boards : News : long application updated to the latest version
Author | Message |
---|---|
Among the advantages are reduced upload files. | |
ID: 28837 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Among the advantages are reduced upload files. Thank GDF :-) PS: I live in the USA. We haven't discovered high speed internet yet... | |
ID: 28838 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ditto here is Canada. It's not just the speeds it's the caps on monthly bytes transferred. Angela Merkel for Prime Minister! | |
ID: 28839 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How do we identify WUs that have reduced upload times? | |
ID: 28842 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How do we identify WUs that have reduced upload times? You can identify by the the application's version number. 6.18 is the latest in the long queue (the previos version was 6.17) | |
ID: 28843 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How do we identify WUs that have reduced upload times? However, I don't see any reduction in the upload size with the 6.18 client. | |
ID: 28851 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Two of my machines are failing every v6.18 WU: | |
ID: 28852 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Two of my machines are failing every v6.18 WU: Installed NVIDIA v310.90 drivers and reset project. Still every v6.18 WU fails. Isn't anyone else seeing this? Of my GPUs, 3 work with v6.18 and 2 don't. All were perfect with v6.17. | |
ID: 28853 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
DUH, nevermind, found the problem: Comodo AV. | |
ID: 28854 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
That's good news you found the problem, one thing I noticed is that my GPU usage is all over the place. On my GTX670s and 680 it dips as low as 67%, on the lone GTX560 I'm still using it stays right around 99%. Anyone else notice this? It doesn't seem to effect the run times too much though. | |
ID: 28855 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Mine are all pretty steady at 88-89% so far. | |
ID: 28856 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Two of my machines are failing every v6.18 WU: Same here, but it has only happened on my xp computer, so far. Windows 7 seems to be ok right now. See link: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6549840 http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6552217 Here is the log information: 2/28/2013 1:32:41 AM | GPUGRID | Computation for task App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1 finished 2/28/2013 1:32:41 AM | GPUGRID | Output file App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_1 for task App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1 absent 2/28/2013 1:32:41 AM | GPUGRID | Output file App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_2 for task App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1 absent 2/28/2013 1:32:41 AM | GPUGRID | Output file App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_3 for task App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1 absent 2/28/2013 1:32:54 AM | GPUGRID | Starting task Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0 using acemdlong version 618 (cuda42) in slot 2 2/28/2013 1:32:55 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_0 2/28/2013 1:32:55 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_4 2/28/2013 1:33:05 AM | GPUGRID | Finished upload of App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_0 2/28/2013 1:33:05 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_7 2/28/2013 1:33:06 AM | GPUGRID | Finished upload of App120_r1-TONI_AGGd8-12-100-RND4947_1_7 2/28/2013 1:38:09 AM | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. 2/28/2013 1:38:09 AM | GPUGRID | Reporting 1 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks 2/28/2013 1:38:13 AM | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed 2/28/2013 6:27:38 AM | GPUGRID | Computation for task Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0 finished 2/28/2013 6:27:38 AM | GPUGRID | Output file Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_1 for task Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0 absent 2/28/2013 6:27:38 AM | GPUGRID | Output file Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_2 for task Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0 absent 2/28/2013 6:27:38 AM | GPUGRID | Output file Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_3 for task Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0 absent 2/28/2013 6:27:51 AM | GPUGRID | Starting task pp165_r2-TONI_AGGd8-21-100-RND4169_1 using acemdlong version 618 (cuda42) in slot 2 2/28/2013 6:27:52 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_0 2/28/2013 6:27:52 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_4 2/28/2013 6:28:03 AM | GPUGRID | Finished upload of Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_0 2/28/2013 6:28:03 AM | GPUGRID | Started upload of Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_7 2/28/2013 6:28:06 AM | GPUGRID | Finished upload of Ann090_r1-TONI_AGGd8-14-100-RND3960_0_7 2/28/2013 6:33:08 AM | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. 2/28/2013 6:33:08 AM | GPUGRID | Reporting 1 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks 2/28/2013 6:33:12 AM | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed From windows 7 computer: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6549243 | |
ID: 28868 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Check to see if your antivirus or antispyware is blocking the new app, That was my problem, but didn't happen on every machine, just 2. | |
ID: 28870 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Only new WUs will have reduced upload sizes. The old ones will be the same. | |
ID: 28879 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Not sure if there's more work being done by the new app or the WUs are different or maybe v6.18 is less efficient; but so far my WU times are 5-7% slower on all 5 GPUs. | |
ID: 28880 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it should be the same on the same workunits. | |
ID: 28894 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Check to see if your antivirus or antispyware is blocking the new app, That was my problem, but didn't happen on every machine, just 2. What did you actually do with your antivirus / antispyware that fixed this problem? And the more important question is that version 6.17 was working just fine, I didn't do anything different to this computer, along comes version 6.18, and I get errors on one of my computers, so what is the problem with 6.18? http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=30790 My other computer is working just fine. | |
ID: 28897 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
What did you actually do with your antivirus / antispyware that fixed this problem? I marked the file as trusted (Comodo AV). You can also mark rhe whole directory as trusted. And the more important question is that version 6.17 was working just fine, I didn't do anything different to this computer, along comes version 6.18, and I get errors on one of my computers, so what is the problem with 6.18? Your problem might be different as in my case the WUs would fail immediately. Yours are failing with the same exit code but are running for a good length of time first. | |
ID: 28900 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Your problem might be different as in my case the WUs would fail immediately. Yours are failing with the same exit code but are running for a good length of time first. That might be the difference between an 'on access' AV check and a scheduled scan. You often have to manage the two separate sets of exclusions independently. | |
ID: 28901 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it should be the same on the same workunits. OK, I have more data now, and found a commonality. All 5 have 1 NV GPU and 1 ATI. On the 3 machines running POEM on the ATI GPU: Machine 1, GTX 460: 8-9% slower with v6.18 Machine 2, GTX 460: 3-9% slower with v6.18 Machine 3, 650 TI: 7-8% slower with v6.18 On machines running Collatz or Moo on the ATI GPU: Machine 4, GTX 460: the same with v6.18 Machine 5, GTX 460: the same with v6.18 Interesting, the difference may be that POEM is much more CPU intensive than either Collatz or Moo. For some reason there seems to be more contention between GPUGrid & POEM (fighting for CPU time?) with v6.18. | |
ID: 28902 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
BUG REPORT Stderr output <core_client_version>7.0.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> El sistema no puede encontrar la ruta especificada. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> <stderr_txt> MDIO: cannot open file "restart.coor" SWAN : FATAL : Cuda driver error 999 in file 'swanlibnv2.cpp' in line 1574. Assertion failed: a, file swanlibnv2.cpp, line 59 This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. </stderr_txt> ]]> the message translates to: "System can't find specified path". The error presents itself only when shuting down BOINC but has no problem when crunching the WU's. | |
ID: 28905 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Also, when the error presents itself, I have to manually unable starting BOINC at startup (when on safe mode), otherwise, the BSOD will appear every restart when BOINC restarts... | |
ID: 28906 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Just got this (like Jorge): <core_client_version>7.0.52</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3) </message> <stderr_txt> MDIO: cannot open file "restart.coor" SWAN : FATAL : Cuda driver error 999 in file 'swanlibnv2.cpp' in line 1574. Assertion failed: a, file swanlibnv2.cpp, line 59 This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. </stderr_txt> Never saw this with v6.17. Also, it was a NOELIA WU, haven't seen it with TONI. | |
ID: 28912 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Only new WUs will have reduced upload sizes. The old ones will be the same. A new NOELIA task has as large as 164MB upload file. It's time to tell the code to output in that different (compressed) format. | |
ID: 28914 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
While running my first 6.18 long run task my laptop locked up and I had to do a hard reboot. After the system was back up this WU had terminated with an error. The details are below. However, I have run two 6.18 WUs successfully since then. It appears one other host also terminated with an error on this WU. | |
ID: 28915 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I thought Noelia asked us to report bugs in the other thread she started a couple days ago? | |
ID: 28922 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
BUG REPORT I got the same error. The WU was running normally, when I rebooted the computer. After reboot the WU crashed. http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6558798 Application 6.18 is turning into a nightmare, too many errors. Let go back to 6.17, and send 6.18 back to beta. | |
ID: 28925 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
After the new drivers where installed (which didn't solve the problem) I reinitiated GPUGrid and uninstalled/reinstalled BOINC. Hope this will fix the problem. | |
ID: 28928 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
6.18 apps do have a problem (70% sure about that ;) ) | |
ID: 28949 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
windows crashes (BSOD's) (I do not know if all these steps are necessary, but they are enough for me, system has to have at least 3 useable -not physical, but "logical"- GPU's): Not sure if this applies but just saw this warning: "Microsoft pushes another botched automatic update": "If you had Windows set for automatic updates last Tuesday, Feb 26, and you run 64-bit Windows 7, you may have been hit by the latest bad patch. KB 2670838 -- known officially as a "Platform Update for Windows 7 x64-Edition" -- appears to be the source of a blue screen problem, where Internet Explorer 9, in particular, stops working and throws a "PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA" error identifying the video driver (the reports I've seen cite igdpmd64.sys) as the source of the BSOD." http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/microsoft-pushes-another-botched-automatic-update-213802?source=IFWNLE_nlt_blogs_2013-03-04 Edit: Personally I avoid IE like the plague. | |
ID: 28977 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
windows crashes (BSOD's) (I do not know if all these steps are necessary, but they are enough for me, system has to have at least 3 useable -not physical, but "logical"- GPU's): Looking at my Windows 7/64 computer, Microsoft Update is telling me "No important updates available": that update is listed as available, but optional. My automatic settings for important updates are set to "Download updates, but let me choose whether to install them" - KB2670838 wasn't even listed until I went looking for it. | |
ID: 28979 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
windows crashes (BSOD's) (I do not know if all these steps are necessary, but they are enough for me, system has to have at least 3 useable -not physical, but "logical"- GPU's): I think I ran into it a couple hours ago. I accidentally clicked Windows media Center on one of my remote machines and it crashed the NVidia driver. Never saw that before (WMC probably starts up a lot of IE code), and yes the new "Platform Update for Windows 7" was installed. It took a cold reboot to get things back working again. | |
ID: 28987 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
windows crashes (BSOD's) (I do not know if all these steps are necessary, but they are enough for me, system has to have at least 3 useable -not physical, but "logical"- GPU's): I do have that update installed. I'll get into it and see if this has been buggin my system. (I also dont use IE) | |
ID: 28988 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I just had a segfault on a new Noelia. I had a very similar segfault on a short NATHAN earlier, so I don't think it's Noelia's fault. | |
ID: 28995 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
From the article, "its status was changed from Important to Optional on Thursday". | |
ID: 29005 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
From the article, "its status was changed from Important to Optional on Thursday". In my case I have windows update set to "Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them". I saw the "important" update ready to DL and install so I did on several machines. Turned out to be a bad idea... | |
ID: 29011 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
My rig has recently been able to crunch some data, although more than one variable was changed after the BSOD's: | |
ID: 29090 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : News : long application updated to the latest version