Message boards : Number crunching : Low Credit WU
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
juan BFP Send message Joined: 11 Dec 11 Posts: 21 Credit: 145,887,858 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications      | |
|
Just curiosity why this WU get so few credit (takes mote than 40K sec to process on my host and 145k sec on the wingmen host) and why it was processed by two hosts? | |
ID: 31088 | Rating: 0 | rate:
 /   Reply
Quote
| |
Just curiosity why this WU get so few credit (takes mote than 40K sec to process on my host and 145k sec on the wingmen host) and why it was processed by two hosts? It took your wingman, more than 24 hours to complete so no bonus. But eventually your wingman reported the WU earlier than you did, so no bonus for you as well. Credits are granted evenly to all rigs. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
| ID: 31089 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
juan BFP Send message Joined: 11 Dec 11 Posts: 21 Credit: 145,887,858 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Just curiosity why this WU get so few credit (takes mote than 40K sec to process on my host and 145k sec on the wingmen host) and why it was processed by two hosts? Thanks TJ. That i allready understand but why the WU was sended to my host to crunch before thewingman expiration date? (the wingman WU was sended few days before and not expired) if in theory minimum quorum 1 and initital replication 1 parameters shows there are expected to send only to 1 host? and only send to a new host if the WU have any processing problem (error or expiration). ____________  | |
| ID: 31096 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
...but why the WU was sended to my host to crunch before thewingman expiration date? Not quite...It looks to me like you were sent the task (almost) 2 hours after your wingman's 5-day expiration was up. By that time, he had probably started to run it, so his task wasn't cancelled. From there, what TJ said... :-) ____________ | |
| ID: 31098 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
juan BFP Send message Joined: 11 Dec 11 Posts: 21 Credit: 145,887,858 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
...but why the WU was sended to my host to crunch before thewingman expiration date? If that is the case is some kind of "bug in credit system", if my host receive the WU AFTER the wingman expiration time and process and report it within the 24 hrs is expected my WU receive the "bonus credit", his must receive 0 because it was reported AFTER his expiration time. Anyway Thanks for the help. ____________ | |
| ID: 31102 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
If that is the case is some kind of "bug in credit system"... Perhaps...But, I think it's a relatively rare occurrence and there may be perfectly valid reasons why it works like this. Many people have experienced this same issue (including me not too long ago) and it's been discussed in other threads. Who knows if it will ever change? Crunch on! :-) ____________ | |
| ID: 31105 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester  Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications  | |
|
Yeah, it is an old bug. Not easy to fix, apparently. | |
| ID: 31116 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
juan BFP Send message Joined: 11 Dec 11 Posts: 21 Credit: 145,887,858 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Thanks all for the answers. | |
| ID: 31119 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Message boards : Number crunching : Low Credit WU
