BETA nathan performance per GPU

Message boards : Number crunching : BETA nathan performance per GPU

Author	Message
5pot Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32252 - Posted: 25 Aug 2013 \| 0:05:26 UTC
	So now that we seem to have some pretty stable WUs working on the GK110s, I'm curious as to how they're performing against other cards. For those of you that have ran them, let's do some comparisons. Post the following: OS Driver GPU Clock Completion time So, for me: W7 326.80 780 1100MHz 4200s
	ID: 32252 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,236,365,968 RAC: 2,920,172 Level Scientific publications	Message 32254 - Posted: 25 Aug 2013 \| 0:17:20 UTC - in response to Message 32252.
	WinXPx64 326.80 GTX680 1201MHz 5915sec WinXPx64 326.80 GTX670 980MHz (I think it's 1089MHz) 6700sec
	ID: 32254 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

5pot Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32277 - Posted: 25 Aug 2013 \| 21:49:21 UTC
	That's a larger difference than I was expecting. Thx for posting.
	ID: 32277 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32281 - Posted: 25 Aug 2013 \| 23:34:04 UTC - in response to Message 32277. Last modified: 25 Aug 2013 \| 23:35:17 UTC
	W7x64 326.41 GTX660 1058MHz 9,677.37 I4R18-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-0-50-RND9988_0 4715247 24 Aug 2013 \| 12:51:21 UTC 24 Aug 2013 \| 18:19:46 UTC Completed and validated 9,677.37 9,610.10 60,900.00 ACEMD beta version v8.00 (cuda55) Stderr output <core_client_version>7.0.64</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # GPU [GeForce GTX 660] Platform [Windows] Rev [3170M] VERSION [55] # SWAN Device 1 : # Name : GeForce GTX 660 # ECC : Disabled # Global mem : 2048MB # Capability : 3.0 # PCI ID : 0000:02:00.0 # Device clock : 1032MHz # Memory clock : 3004MHz # Memory width : 192bit # Driver version : r325_00 # Time per step (avg over 750000 steps): 12.926 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 9694.418 s called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> W7x64 326.41 GTX660Ti 1202MHz 7,968.66 I4R17-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-0-50-RND0647_0 4715246 24 Aug 2013 \| 12:51:21 UTC 24 Aug 2013 \| 15:49:10 UTC Completed and validated 7,968.66 7,873.42 60,900.00 ACEMD beta version v8.00 (cuda55) Stderr output <core_client_version>7.0.64</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # GPU [GeForce GTX 660 Ti] Platform [Windows] Rev [3170M] VERSION [55] # SWAN Device 0 : # Name : GeForce GTX 660 Ti # ECC : Disabled # Global mem : 2048MB # Capability : 3.0 # PCI ID : 0000:05:00.0 # Device clock : 1110MHz # Memory clock : 3004MHz # Memory width : 192bit # Driver version : r325_00 # Time per step (avg over 750000 steps): 10.636 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 7976.849 s called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> The actual clock speed of the GTX660Ti while running is typically 1189 or 1202MHz, not 1110MHz. The GTX660 is 1058MHz. Don't know how close these WU's are to the real thing, but I suspect the GK110 cards might offer more to some WU types than others, and might open up opportunities. ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help
	ID: 32281 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

TJ Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32315 - Posted: 27 Aug 2013 \| 8:11:44 UTC
	Win7x64 326.80 GTX660 1032MHz 9,981.93 ____________ Greetings from TJ
	ID: 32315 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32320 - Posted: 27 Aug 2013 \| 14:14:10 UTC - in response to Message 32315.
	Might also be of interest, I2R14-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-6-50-RND4316_0 running on a GTX660 (W7) GPU power ~97% (short run wu was 93%) GPU temp 67°C (short run WU was 70°C) fan set to 67% (2100rpm) GPU usage 95% (short run WU was 88%) Core clock 1071MHz (same as with the short run WU) Memory usage 879MB (short run was 403MB) ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help
	ID: 32320 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

TJ Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32321 - Posted: 27 Aug 2013 \| 15:12:20 UTC - in response to Message 32320. Last modified: 27 Aug 2013 \| 15:18:42 UTC
	I had these on my GTX660. But I can´t give you the details when running as I didn´t see it at the time. The one I have now I1R12-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-16-50-RND2792 running on the 660, uses: GPU power: ~97% GPU temp.:69°C GPU load: ~94% MEM load: 51%, 1048MB Core clock: 1032MHz ____________ Greetings from TJ
	ID: 32321 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32333 - Posted: 27 Aug 2013 \| 20:04:10 UTC - in response to Message 32321.
	TJ, in science there is nothing better than independent confirmation. Thanks, ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help
	ID: 32333 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

TJ Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 32335 - Posted: 27 Aug 2013 \| 20:31:04 UTC - in response to Message 32333.
	Your welcome skgiven, it was a relief to me that my 660 is behaving almost the same as yours. ____________ Greetings from TJ
	ID: 32335 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : BETA nathan performance per GPU

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate