I652-SANTI_baxbimSPW-0-62-RND0982_0
Packet =4948744

This file is now over 6 hrs crunching
ready only 52%
Display Resttime: 1:35
This could'nt be

Yes, I have a similar one from the 'short' queue - just approaching 95% after 16 hours on a GTX 470. Looks like it's making slow but steady progress and should complete within the hour - though outside 24 hours from when it was issued.

Perhaps there was a muddle which queue these tasks should be loaded into?

I60-SANTI_baxbimSPW-0-62-RND2323_0

"Me too": http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=4948159

To abort or not to abort... that is the question.

- Current time: 10h16m
- Estimated remaining: 2h4m, but this number decreases by 1s every 9s clock time.
- When this WU ran on another computer, it exited after 13s with "The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1)"

So my projection is more like "20h remaining" if BOINC's estimate doesn't decelerate further (which I suspect it will).

Yup, I think I just answered my own question: abort. :-)

%17.75 after twelve hours.
Knocks the crap outa the system.High CPU useage.
Computer basically unusable while crunching.
If I suspend workunit, BOINC?? craps out and I get low ( %5 - %30) GPU usuage and very little progress.After reboot GPU usage between %85 - %90 but still very slow crunching.

Wrong "queue" ??

http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7494659

http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7494640

These 'short tasks' have all the hallmarks of long tasks except for the credit

Why i reactiveded short queue -_- got the same..
____________
DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at

Puh
Starttime 10:00 o'clock yesterday in the morning
now it's midnight 2:00 o'clock
crunching time round about 16 Hrs !
This was never a short part....
My GPU is so hot I can fry eggs on it

Yes you are right, we apologize a lot. There was a mistake in the sending of the WUs and they were indeed configured for the long queue. Santi has hopefully by now stopped all further WUs (but we won't cancel currently running ones so that people don't lose credit). I assume he will resend today with correct configuration.

Yes you are right, we apologize a lot. There was a mistake in the sending of the WUs and they were indeed configured for the long queue. Santi has hopefully by now stopped all further WUs (but we won't cancel currently running ones so that people don't lose credit). I assume he will resend today with correct configuration.

Conversely, the new trypsin_lig_356x4-NOELIA_RC5-0-1- series seems to be running for the same time, but paying almost twice as much credit (same host link as last time).

Swings and roundabouts...