Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Upload File Size

Author Message
tomba
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 09
Posts: 497
Credit: 700,690,702
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 34057 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013 | 17:49:39 UTC

Many moons ago we were happy that the project had implemented much smaller file sizes for the results files. Now we are back to the original 50-60 megs, which take forever to upload and must mean many users miss their credit bonuses.

What happened?

Profile dskagcommunity
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 11
Posts: 456
Credit: 817,790,789
RAC: 0
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 34058 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013 | 18:16:51 UTC

Is 50 and 60 not normal? We were up to >128mb some more months ago ^^
____________
DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at



Crunching for my deceased Dog who had "good" Braincancer..

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 34060 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013 | 20:33:17 UTC - in response to Message 34058.

For long-ish WU's, 25MB to around 60MB is normal. A WU that is over 100MB may not have been zipped up using the newer method. For short WU's it should be less.

FAQ - Upload and Download Sizes of Tasks
Feel free to PM me with updates so I can add to the content, useful for now and for historical reference/comparisons.
____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Upload File Size

//