Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : GPUGrid Stats

Author Message
tomba
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 09
Posts: 497
Credit: 700,690,702
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 35606 - Posted: 11 Mar 2014 | 10:07:19 UTC

Since May last year I’ve been keeping a log of my 24/7 GPUGrid processing. Up to the turn of the year I had a GTX 660. Since then I’ve had 3xGTX 660.

Below is a summary chart:

. Almost half the total WUs are SANTIs; 48%
. The most generous for credits are NATHANs, closely followed by NOELIAs and SDOERRs
. SANTI and GIANNI credits could do with a boost!
. NOELIAs lead the error stakes by some considerable margin.


mikey
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 09
Posts: 286
Credit: 573,060,776
RAC: 356
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 35608 - Posted: 11 Mar 2014 | 11:20:40 UTC - in response to Message 35606.

Since May last year I’ve been keeping a log of my 24/7 GPUGrid processing. Up to the turn of the year I had a GTX 660. Since then I’ve had 3xGTX 660.

Below is a summary chart:

. Almost half the total WUs are SANTIs; 48%
. The most generous for credits are NATHANs, closely followed by NOELIAs and SDOERRs
. SANTI and GIANNI credits could do with a boost!
. NOELIAs lead the error stakes by some considerable margin.




So we should be crunching ONLY SDOERR units as they give nearly the most credits and give NO errors?!!

Stefan
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 13
Posts: 348
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 35612 - Posted: 11 Mar 2014 | 14:37:39 UTC - in response to Message 35608.
Last modified: 11 Mar 2014 | 14:43:23 UTC

Only problem is I rarely ever send anything and when I do it's to test methods :D
And I don't do anything magical that I could teach the other guys. I only copy some old system someone else prepared some years ago.
Sooo, unfortunately no, hehe.

As for the error rates, keep in mind these are for one machine. The overview of all machines on GPUGrid shows a very different image

The credits comparisson though is nice to see. I didn't expect us to be so good actually :D (except Gianni maybe)

tomba
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 09
Posts: 497
Credit: 700,690,702
RAC: 0
Level
Lys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 35687 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014 | 16:51:19 UTC

The 21 SDOERR WUs I reported below returned a generous average of 11283 credits per hour on my GTX 660.

I just completed this SDOERR; just 8201 credits per hour.

Seems I had a "wingman" and neither of us got the early-completion bonus.

Question: why was this WU sent twice?

Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 35699 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014 | 22:02:15 UTC - in response to Message 35687.
Last modified: 16 Mar 2014 | 22:04:04 UTC

The WU was sent out twice because the initial replication was set to 2.

7936578 157241 16 Mar 2014 | 6:01:40 UTC 16 Mar 2014 | 16:23:58 UTC Completed and validated 33,976.09 14,182.33 77,400.00 Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.15 (cuda42)

7936579 164104 16 Mar 2014 | 4:40:46 UTC 16 Mar 2014 | 15:38:35 UTC Completed and validated 18,512.13 5,939.77 77,400.00 Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.15 (cuda55)

There is a thread about the credits being shared, somewhere.
____________
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : GPUGrid Stats

//