GPUGrid Stats

Message boards : Number crunching : GPUGrid Stats

Author	Message
tomba Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 497 Credit: 700,690,702 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 35606 - Posted: 11 Mar 2014 \| 10:07:19 UTC
	Since May last year I’ve been keeping a log of my 24/7 GPUGrid processing. Up to the turn of the year I had a GTX 660. Since then I’ve had 3xGTX 660. Below is a summary chart: . Almost half the total WUs are SANTIs; 48% . The most generous for credits are NATHANs, closely followed by NOELIAs and SDOERRs . SANTI and GIANNI credits could do with a boost! . NOELIAs lead the error stakes by some considerable margin.
	ID: 35606 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

mikey Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 298 Credit: 6,601,400,210 RAC: 16,435,860 Level Scientific publications	Message 35608 - Posted: 11 Mar 2014 \| 11:20:40 UTC - in response to Message 35606.
	Since May last year I’ve been keeping a log of my 24/7 GPUGrid processing. Up to the turn of the year I had a GTX 660. Since then I’ve had 3xGTX 660. Below is a summary chart: . Almost half the total WUs are SANTIs; 48% . The most generous for credits are NATHANs, closely followed by NOELIAs and SDOERRs . SANTI and GIANNI credits could do with a boost! . NOELIAs lead the error stakes by some considerable margin. So we should be crunching ONLY SDOERR units as they give nearly the most credits and give NO errors?!!
	ID: 35608 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 5 Mar 13 Posts: 348 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 35612 - Posted: 11 Mar 2014 \| 14:37:39 UTC - in response to Message 35608. Last modified: 11 Mar 2014 \| 14:43:23 UTC
	Only problem is I rarely ever send anything and when I do it's to test methods :D And I don't do anything magical that I could teach the other guys. I only copy some old system someone else prepared some years ago. Sooo, unfortunately no, hehe. As for the error rates, keep in mind these are for one machine. The overview of all machines on GPUGrid shows a very different image The credits comparisson though is nice to see. I didn't expect us to be so good actually :D (except Gianni maybe)
	ID: 35612 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

tomba Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 497 Credit: 700,690,702 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 35687 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014 \| 16:51:19 UTC
	The 21 SDOERR WUs I reported below returned a generous average of 11283 credits per hour on my GTX 660. I just completed this SDOERR; just 8201 credits per hour. Seems I had a "wingman" and neither of us got the early-completion bonus. Question: why was this WU sent twice?
	ID: 35687 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 35699 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014 \| 22:02:15 UTC - in response to Message 35687. Last modified: 16 Mar 2014 \| 22:04:04 UTC
	The WU was sent out twice because the initial replication was set to 2. 7936578 157241 16 Mar 2014 \| 6:01:40 UTC 16 Mar 2014 \| 16:23:58 UTC Completed and validated 33,976.09 14,182.33 77,400.00 Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.15 (cuda42) 7936579 164104 16 Mar 2014 \| 4:40:46 UTC 16 Mar 2014 \| 15:38:35 UTC Completed and validated 18,512.13 5,939.77 77,400.00 Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.15 (cuda55) There is a thread about the credits being shared, somewhere. ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help
	ID: 35699 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : GPUGrid Stats

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate