Message boards : Number crunching : SDOERR_ntl9evsss3 / lenght / credit / GPU use
Author | Message |
---|---|
Hello ! | |
ID: 39111 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
| |
ID: 39119 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
On a GTX 680: | |
ID: 39123 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Dear Stefan,
Thank You Kind Regards Philippe | |
ID: 39127 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Dear Philippe,
Time
stamp
Rank User name WU id (h) GPU description
1 petebe 10338739 5.25 [3] GTX 980 (4095MB) driver: 344.11
2 captainjack 10391665 6.65 [2] GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 343.22
3 s0m3wh4t 10388100 6.66 [2] GTX 780 Ti (3072MB) driver: 344.65
4 Alex 10395793 6.87 GTX 980 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
5 Betting Slip 10405882 6.93 GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
6 JugNut 10400682 7.08 [2] GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.48
7 Norman 10395785 7.15 GTX 780 Ti (3072MB) driver: 344.75
8 YannTC 10400672 7.23 GTX 980 (4095MB) driver: 344.11
9 Phil1966 10400677 7.25 [2] GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
10 Astiesan 10383229 7.29 GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
11 Ian Laksmana 10405880 7.33 GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
12 tcrbiker 10400664 7.42 GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
13 Masta-Killa 10395792 8.02 GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
14 Dave GPU 10383226 8.05 [2] GTX 770 (2048MB) driver: 344.75
15 ERBrouwer 10383231 8.11 GTX 970 (4095MB) driver: 344.75
16 BruceR 10395791 8.12 [2] GTX 780 (3072MB) driver: 344.60
17 RaymondFO* 10391662 8.31 [2] GTX 980 (133656575MB)
18 Sebastian M. Bobrecki 10405885 8.32 GTX 680 (2047MB)
19 Viktor Svantner 10405887 8.38 [2] GTX TITAN Black (4095MB) driver: 344.75
20 Dennisd 10391658 8.41 GTX 780 (3072MB) driver: 344.65 About your original problem: As you can see on the chart above, Petebe's host is much faster than any other host on this list. The reason for that this host is running Windows XP x64, which doesn't have the "Windows Display Driver Model" architecture (it's introduced in Windows Vista). This new WDDM is much safer - as a display driver crash won't let the PC to have a BSOD - in exchange it has an overhead on every GPU operation making it slower. This method taxes different workunits to different extent, as the frequency of the interaction between the CPU and the GPU is different for every type of workunit batches. This workunit batch have a higher frequency of CPU-GPU interaction, so it will run slower on Windows Vista (7, 8, 8.1 and later). That's why your GPU is colder while crunching these workunits compared to other batches. | |
ID: 39130 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hello Zoltan, | |
ID: 39134 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes sorry, I didn't know petebe was such a star :P I just chose the first completed WU I saw in the list, hehe. | |
ID: 39136 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Number crunching : SDOERR_ntl9evsss3 / lenght / credit / GPU use