Message boards : Number crunching : Bad batch of tasks?
Author | Message |
---|---|
One of my machines has had two recently from | |
ID: 48010 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
same here with | |
ID: 48012 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
On the Project Status Page, at the moment this type of task shows an error rate of 68.69% ! | |
ID: 48014 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
just a minute ago, another task from this batch errored out after 35 seconds. | |
ID: 48015 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Interestingly enough, on the Project Status Page this batch is now listed under "short runs" - why so? | |
ID: 48016 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Have I caught you talking to yourself again Erich? | |
ID: 48017 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Have I caught you talking to yourself again Erich? in absence of any reaction/answer/comment from the GPUGRID people this may look like talking to myself, yes :-( | |
ID: 48022 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
just a minute ago, another task from this batch errored out after 35 seconds. It is actually better to let these units run the course, and become a "too many errors (may have a bug)" units, which means they will eventually disappear from your computer's task page. If they are canceled before that, they will stay with you forever. It is a bug in the system! This is mentioned in another thread, somewhere. Here's another question. Where are the new IT people or person, that were or was supposed to be hired earlier this year to fix this and other problems? | |
ID: 48023 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Here's another question. Where are the new IT people or person, that were or was supposed to be hired earlier this year to fix this and other problems? I suspect there is no such person yet. Unless someone from GPUGRID can tell us the contrary. | |
ID: 48025 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Bad batch of tasks?